Blake Lively Suffers Blow in 'Smear Campaign' Claim as Judge Dismisses Case Against Justin Baldoni's Social Media Guru Jed WallaceNew Foto - Blake Lively Suffers Blow in 'Smear Campaign' Claim as Judge Dismisses Case Against Justin Baldoni's Social Media Guru Jed Wallace

In a federal lawsuit filed in December, Blake Lively claimed that a mysterious Texas-based social media guru ran an untraceable smear campaign against her at the behest of Justin Baldoni. On Wednesday, a judge granted Jed Wallace's motion to dismiss himself as a defendant in the case. Judge Lewis Liman made his ruling without prejudice, meaning Lively has until July 31 to file an amended complaint or sue in him in a different jurisdiction. Still, the decision is a blow to her claim that she endured a smear campaign at the hands of the man who was enlisted by Baldoni and publicists Melissa Nathan and Jen Abel during the run-up to the 2024 drama "It Ends With Us," which Baldoni directed and Lively toplined. More from Variety Blake Lively Wins Ruling That Her Deposition in Justin Baldoni Case Will Be Held on Her Turf Justin Baldoni Can Seek Messages Between Taylor Swift and Blake Lively, Judge Rules Blake Lively Moves to Block Justin Baldoni From Obtaining Taylor Swift Communications Judge Liman ruled that the Lively did not prove her case that New York is the proper venue for Wallace to be sued. "The Wallace Defendant's motion to dismiss must be granted because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over them," Judge Liman wrote in a 38-page ruling. "The alleged negative publicity campaign against Lively largely took place outside of New York. The few alleged actions targeting New York were taken by others, and there are no allegations suggesting the Wallace Defendants were aware of them. Therefore, the Wallace Defendants cannot be forced to defend this lawsuit in New York." Lively had argued that Wallace and his boutique firm Street Relations worked in tandem with Baldoni and his team to plant negative stories about her in retaliation for her complaints about alleged sexual harassment complaints she made during the production of the Sony domestic violence drama that became a breakout hit last summer. "Lively alleges that as part of their efforts to 'bury' Lively, Nathan, Abel, Wallace, and Street Relations 'targeted New York by, among other things, communicating with (or causing content to be provided to) journalists, content creators and media entities based in New York, including at least one journalist at the New York Post and another at the New York Times,' … to shape coverage and contribute to stories that were eventually published in those outlets," Liman wrote. "These allegations might support personal jurisdiction against Abel and Nathan … even if those two did not engage in their conduct from within New York. … However, Lively has not alleged facts that would show that the Wallace Defendants were aware of those jurisdictional contacts." Nathan and her firm TAG are based in Los Angeles as is Abel. "The Amended Complaint alleges that Wallace was generally in contact with Abel, Nathan, and TAG, and that they worked together to suppress negative content about Baldoni and amplify negative content about Lively. It is fair to infer that Wallace would have known, as a general matter, that Abel and Nathan were talking to media in furtherance of this aim." Lively's case against Baldoni and several other members of his team including two publicists will proceed in federal court with Judge Liman overseeing. It is one of a handful of cases tied to friction on the set of "It Ends With Us." Baldoni's defamation suit against Lively and others including the New York Times, which published the first story about what allegedly happened on that set,was thrown out. Wallace is separately suing Lively for defamation in Texas. In a statement toVariety, Lively's spokesperson says: "Ms. Lively respects the Court's decision, which has nothing to do with the merits of her allegations about Mr. Wallace's role in the smear campaign and relates solely to the procedural question of whether he is subject to jurisdiction in New York or elsewhere.  We currently are evaluating our numerous options for holding Mr. Wallace accountable for the pivotal role he served in the retaliatory effort that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties paid him at least tens of thousands of dollars a month to perform." Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Final Emmy Predictions: Talk Series and Scripted Variety - New Blood Looks to Tackle Late Night Staples Sign up forVariety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us onFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram.

Blake Lively Suffers Blow in ‘Smear Campaign’ Claim as Judge Dismisses Case Against Justin Baldoni’s Social Media Guru Jed Wallace

Blake Lively Suffers Blow in 'Smear Campaign' Claim as Judge Dismisses Case Against Justin Baldoni's Social Media Guru Jed Walla...
Ariana Grande Addresses Rumors She Plans to 'Abandon' Music: 'Doing It My Own Way'New Foto - Ariana Grande Addresses Rumors She Plans to 'Abandon' Music: 'Doing It My Own Way'

Chelsea Guglielmino/FilmMagic Ariana Grande is addressing rumors she plans to "abandon" her music career "it is and has always been my lifeline. there will need to be room made for all of it," she explained Earlier this week, she was confirmed as a voice actor inWickeddirector Jon M. Chu's upcoming animated film adaptation of the Dr. Seuss book,Oh, the Places You'll Go! IsAriana Grandedone with music? After the Grammy winner, 32, confirmed a new acting role earlier this week, she took toInstagramon Wednesday, July 16 to address rumors she plans to "abandon" her music career. Alongside a video of herself performing at the 2024 Met Gala, Grande wrote, "very silly of you all to assume that just because i have my hands full with many things that i plan to abandon singing & music … !!!" "it is and has always been my lifeline. there will need to be room made for all of it," she explained. TheWickedactress, who released her latest albumEternal Sunshinelast year, continued, "it may not look exactly like it did before but i much prefer how it looks in my head. i am having fun. i feel grateful and excited and inspired." Grande then went into detail, telling fans she's "finding a balance, between many projects and endeavors i love, and doing it my own way…" At the end of the note, she revealed a mini upcoming tour is in the works: "so i'm working on a plan to sing for you all next year. even if it's just for a little. i love you." Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Tristan Fewings/BAFTA/Getty One day before shutting down the rumors, Grande was confirmed as a voice actor inWickeddirectorJon M. Chu's upcoming animated film adaptation of the Dr. Seuss book,Oh, the Places You'll Go! "i love this book, i love this script, i love the beautiful world of @drseuss, i love this incredible group of creative human beings," she wrote in an Instagram Stories post, perEntertainment Weekly. "i am so thrilled to be a part of this one." Taylor Hill/Getty In anInstagramgrid post, she shared a photo of herself and Josh Gad in a recording studio while holding binders printed with their names andOh, the Places You'll Go!artwork. Grande is set to reprise her role as Galinda "Glinda" Upland inWicked: For Good, set to hit theaters on November 21, 2025. In May, she was also announced tostar opposite Robert De Niro and Ben Stiller in the upcoming fourthMeet the Parentsfilm. The "Positions" singer's last major string of concerts was the Sweetener World Tour in 2019. Read the original article onPeople

Ariana Grande Addresses Rumors She Plans to 'Abandon' Music: 'Doing It My Own Way'

Ariana Grande Addresses Rumors She Plans to 'Abandon' Music: 'Doing It My Own Way' Chelsea Guglielmino/FilmMagic Ariana Gran...
Tomorrowland Main Stage Destroyed by Fire Day Before Opening, But Festival Will Go OnNew Foto - Tomorrowland Main Stage Destroyed by Fire Day Before Opening, But Festival Will Go On

Electronic music festivalTomorrowland will go ahead as planned, despite the main stage being destroyed by a massive fire on Wednesday — just one day before festivities were set to begin. In a statement shared onInstagram, organizers of the festival in Belgium wrote, "Due to a serious incident and fire on the Tomorrowland Mainstage, our beloved Mainstage has been severely damaged." They also confirmed there were no fatal injuries. More from Variety Tomorrowland 2021 Canceled by Belgian Officials Katy Perry, David Guetta, Steve Aoki Preview Tomorrowland Around the World Virtual Festival Katy Perry to Headline Virtual Tomorrowland Festival Organizers said Tomorrowland will open its DreamVille campsite on July 17, where several events and performances will take place. Additional events planned in Brussels and Antwerp will also go ahead "as planned." As for the remaining days of the festival, which is set to run July 18 through 20 in the town of Boom, south of Antwerp (and with weekend two running from July 24 through 27), organizers said: "We are focused on finding solutions for the festival weekend. More updates and detailed information will be communicated as soon as possible." Videos posted to social media in the last few hours show clouds of thick smoke engulfing the stage. Firefighters and law enforcement have not yet identified the cause of the fire, but they have confirmed all emergency services are at the scene. Representatives for Tomorrowland did not immediately returnVariety's request for comment. Over 400,000 are people expected to attend across the two weekends. The lineup for this year's festival included such artists as Swedish House Mafia, Dillon Francis, Deadmau5, David Guetta, Steve Aoki and Eric Prydz, among others. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Final Emmy Predictions: Talk Series and Scripted Variety - New Blood Looks to Tackle Late Night Staples Sign up forVariety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us onFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram.

Tomorrowland Main Stage Destroyed by Fire Day Before Opening, But Festival Will Go On

Tomorrowland Main Stage Destroyed by Fire Day Before Opening, But Festival Will Go On Electronic music festivalTomorrowland will go ahead as...
Nebraska sues neighboring Colorado over how much water it's drawing from the South Platte RiverNew Foto - Nebraska sues neighboring Colorado over how much water it's drawing from the South Platte River

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska is suing Colorado over the amount of water it draws from the South Platte River, the latest in a long history of water rights disputes between the states that have been left increasingly dry by climate change. Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen and state Attorney General Mike Hilgers held a news conference Wednesday to announce the lawsuit, which was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court. "It's crystal clear. Colorado has been holding water back from Nebraska for almost 100 years and getting more and more egregious every single day," Pillen said, pointing to Colorado's rapidly expanding population over the past decade. "So today it's really, really simple: We're here to put our gloves on," Pillen said. "We're going to fight like heck. We're going to get every drop of water." Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser called the lawsuit "unfortunate" in a written statement and said Nebraska officials failed "to look for reasonable solutions." The lawsuit accuses Colorado of depriving Nebraska of as much as 1.3 million acre-feet (about 160,350 hectare-meters) of water from the river over several years that Nebraska is entitled to under a 1923 compact between the states. The suit also accuses Colorado officials of blocking Nebraska's effort toconstruct a massive canal— often called the Perkins County Canal — and reservoir project that would see Nebraska seize land in Colorado to divert water into Nebraska, which is also allowed under the compact. Nebraska needs the water not only for agriculture production in its southwestern region — which climate experts predict will grow hotter and drier in the coming decades — but also to feed water supplies in the eastern part of the state, officials said. Nebraska's capital, Lincoln, is expected to get 12% of its water from the proposed canal, Pillen said. The compact entitles Nebraska to 120 cubic feet (3.4 cubic meters) per second from the river during the irrigation season between April 1 and Oct. 15 each year, and 500 cubic feet (about 14 cubic meters) per second during the non-irrigation fall and winter months. Hilgers said Colorado has been shortchanging Nebraska during the irrigation season, allowing only about 75 cubic feet (about 2 cubic meters) per second of water daily into Nebraska this summer. "I think this may be the most consequential lawsuit that this office will be a part of in my generation," Hilgers said. "It is almost impossible to overstate the importance of the South Platte River to the future of the state of Nebraska." Colorado Gov. Jared Polis issued a statement calling the lawsuit meritless and denied that Colorado had violated the compact. The South Platte, which flows through northeastern Colorado into southwestern Nebraska, has been at the center of a tempest brewing between the two states going back to 2022, when Nebraska announced it would build the canal. Since then, officials from the two states have been haggling over how to carry out both the terms of the compact and land acquisition to build the canal. Hilgers said the two states are at an impasse. Weiser countered that Nebraska officials should have remained at the negotiating table. "Nebraska's actions will force Colorado water users to build additional new projects to lessen the impact of the proposed Perkins County Canal," he said. "When the dust finally settles, likely over a billion dollars will have been spent — tens of millions of that on litigation alone — and no one in Nebraska or Colorado will be better off." The lawsuit was filed directly with the Supreme Court because it handles disputes between states, Hilgers said. The process "isn't fast," he warned. "We'll probably have a special master appointed within the next 12 months, and under normal litigation timelines, that's maybe 3 to 5 years before we get a result," he said. That does not mean work on the canal will stop, he said, as he expects work on permitting and design of the canal to continue. Nebraska has been at the center of interstate water disputes for decades. In 2002, Nebraska, Colorado and Kansas reached a settlement over Republican River water allocation after years of legal wrangling. But disputes continued, and new agreements were reached among the states again in 2014. Water disputes could become more common as climate change worsens shortages, said Dr. Carly Phillips, a research scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists — a nonprofit that advocates for climate change solutions. Warmer temperatures affect multiple parts of the hydrological cycle, Phillips said. It is decreasing the snowpack, which is the main way water is stored in the western U.S. Higher temperatures also mean the snow melts earlier each year, changing the availability of stream flow. And states like Nebraska might see increased irrigation demand when it's hotter. "These patterns are all in the same direction across the board," Phillips said. "The trends are really consistent when it comes to snowpack, stream flow, evaporation and irrigation demand." ____ Associated Press reporter Sarah Raza contributed from Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Nebraska sues neighboring Colorado over how much water it's drawing from the South Platte River

Nebraska sues neighboring Colorado over how much water it's drawing from the South Platte River OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska is suing Col...
Millions want to own but can't: What's being done to address the housing crisis?New Foto - Millions want to own but can't: What's being done to address the housing crisis?

Despite a strong desire to own homes, millions of Americans are still renting. So, what initiatives is Washington implementing to help make homeownership a reality? One significant barrier to homebuying remains high interest rates. President Trump has intensified his criticism of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell in recent weeks. "Jerome Powell has been very bad for our country," Trump recently stated. "We should have the lowest interest rate on earth." The Federal Reserve last cut rates in December. In contrast, Europe has seen eight interest rate cuts over the past year. RELATED STORY |Finding starter homes: More on the market, but expensive as ever With another Fed meeting approaching at the month's end, Powell attributes the ongoing pause to uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariff policy. While Trump hasn't directly attempted to fire Powell, he has mentioned that Powell's term ends in May 2024 and has hinted at naming a successor who may align more closely with his administration's views. Credit scores also play a role in homebuying policies. Earlier this month, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac introduced a new policy considering potential buyers' rent payment history, which could assist those looking to enter the housing market. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner acknowledged the ongoing housing crunch. In a recent interview with the Scripps News Group, he expressed his commitment to reducing regulations to promote the construction of affordable homes. "Taking down regulations is of utmost importance," he said. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT |Trump rips Fed Chair Powell during White House meeting with Bahrain's crown prince However, not all legislative measures have eased housing costs. The National Association of Homebuilders has warned that tariffs could inflate the expense of home construction. Still, Republicans in Congress are optimistic that the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill will provide some relief. While the new legislation does not offer down payment assistance, it does make permanent a deduction on mortgage interest and reinstates a deduction for certain private homeowners insurance policies. Homeowners will also benefit from a heightened deduction for state and local property taxes. Bill Conners, a first-time homebuyer from heavily taxed Southern California, expressed optimism about the changes. "This bill has actually made it a lot easier for people to afford a house," he said. This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

Millions want to own but can't: What's being done to address the housing crisis?

Millions want to own but can't: What's being done to address the housing crisis? Despite a strong desire to own homes, millions of A...
20 states sue FEMA for canceling grant program that guards against natural disastersNew Foto - 20 states sue FEMA for canceling grant program that guards against natural disasters

Twenty Democratic-led states filed suit Wednesday against theFederal Emergency Management Agency, challenging the elimination of a long-running grant program that helps communities guard against damage from natural disasters. The lawsuit contends PresidentDonald Trump's administration acted illegally when it announced in April that it wasending the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communitiesprogram. FEMA canceled some projects already in the works and refused to approve new ones despite funding from Congress. "In the wake of devastatingflooding in Texasand other states, it's clear just how critical federal resources are in helping states prepare for and respond to natural disasters," said Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell of Massachusetts, where the federal lawsuit was filed. "By abruptly and unlawfully shutting down the BRIC program, this administration is abandoning states and local communities that rely on federal funding to protect their residents and, in the event of disaster, save lives." FEMA did not immediately respond Wednesday to a request for comment. It said in April that the program was "wasteful and ineffective" and "more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters." The program, established by a 2000 law, provides grants for a variety of disaster mitigation efforts, including levees to protect against floods, safe rooms to provide shelter from tornadoes, vegetation management to reduce damage from fires and seismic retrofitting to fortify buildings for earthquakes. During his first term, Trump signed a law shoring up funding for disaster risk reduction efforts. The program then got a $1 billion boost from an infrastructure law signed by former President Joe Biden. That law requires FEMA to make available at least $200 million annually for disaster mitigation grants for the 2022-2026 fiscal years, the lawsuit says. The suit contends the Trump administration violated the constitutional separation of powers because Congress had not authorized the program's demise. It also alleges the program's termination was illegal because the decision was made while FEMA was under the leadership ofan acting administratorwho had not met the requirements to be in charge of the agency. The lawsuit says communities in every state have benefited from federal disaster mitigation grants, which saved lives and spared homes, businesses, hospitals and schools from costly damage. Some communities have already been affected by the decision to end the program. Hillsborough, North Carolina, had been awarded nearly $7 million to relocate a wastewater pumping station out of a flood plain and make other water and sewer system improvements. But that hadn't happened yet when the remnants ofTropical Storm Chantaldamaged the pumping station and forced it offline last week. In rural Mount Pleasant, North Carolina, town officials had hoped to use more than $4 million from the BRIC program to improve stormwater drainage and safeguard a vulnerable electric system, thus protecting investments in a historic theater and other businesses. While the community largely supports Trump, assistant town manager Erin Burris said people were blindsided by the lost funding they had spent years pursuing. "I've had downtown property owners saying, 'What do we do?'" Burris said. "I've got engineering plans ready to go and I don't have the money to do it." ___ Associated Press reporters Jack Brook, Michael Casey and Gary D. Robertson contributed to this report. ___ Brook is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.Report for Americais a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

20 states sue FEMA for canceling grant program that guards against natural disasters

20 states sue FEMA for canceling grant program that guards against natural disasters Twenty Democratic-led states filed suit Wednesday again...

 

LEX MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com