Education Department funding freeze targets summer school and language programs that are lifelines for familiesNew Foto - Education Department funding freeze targets summer school and language programs that are lifelines for families

Desperation crept into Sylvia's voice as she rattled off all the ways her life would become more difficult if a free learning program that her son attends during the summer shuts its doors. A single mother, Sylvia works as a janitor and is the sole breadwinner for her family which includes her 10-year-old as well as her ailing mother. "I cannot sleep at night," said Sylvia, who spoke to CNN through a translator as she picked up her son, Gabriel, at the end of a long shift. "Gabriel is asking, 'Mom, why you are crying? Why are you crying, mom?'" She has been crying, she said, because she knows that the glue that keeps it all together — a nonprofit program that allows her son to have a safe place to stay, warm meals and a chance to learn English — is being targeted by the Trump administration. She declined to give her last name, citing privacy concerns amid the current political climate. Aspire Afterschool Learning, where Gabriel spends his days during the summer school break in Arlington, Virginia, is one of more than 10,000 summer and after-school programs across the country that has been pushed into a state of perilous uncertainty after the Department of Education abruptly paused the grant it depends on to keep things running. The fund, called 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC), is a federal program that was among a huge swath of nearly $7 billion of education grants that the department suddenly froze this month, with little notice. An OMB spokesperson told CNN on Saturday, after the publication of this article, that the programmatic review is over for 21st CCLC. "Funds will be released to the states. Guardrails have been put in place to ensure these funds are not used in violation of Executive Orders," the OMB spokesperson said without providing other details on the freeze or the other grant money that was frozen. The halt came amid a review that alleged the money was being used to promote "leftwing" ideologies. It comes as the Trump administration is seeking todismantlethe Department of Education, withmass layoffs underwayand severe funding cuts under consideration. Much of the money goes towards programs that serve some of the US' poorest children. On Monday, some two dozen Democratic-led statessuedthe Department of Education in federal court to release the funds, which had already been approved by Congress and were supposed to have been disbursed to the states on July 1st. But the squeeze is already forcing many summer programs to scramble to stay open, even as schools and educational schemes are bracing for deeper impacts in the fall. The paused funding for K-12 programs included money for teacher education and recruitment, English language programs, student enrichment and nonprofit learning centers that partner with schools, among other initiatives. They are delivered through grant programs like 21stCCLC, with state education agencies distributing the money to grantees, including school districts and nonprofits that run free enrichment programs or work with schools to put on programming throughout the year. One day prior to the date the funds were to be released, the Department of Education instead sent a letter saying that money is not coming, pending a review. "The Department will not be issuing Grant Award Notifications obligating funds for these programs on July 1 prior to completing that review," it said. "The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities." The impact of the freeze is already being felt as it has caused many programs to question whether they will be able to stay open this summer. "It feels like we're punishing a whole lot of students," said Paula Fynboh, who runs Aspire, which provides programming throughout the year. She is cobbling together money to keep the summer school running through student-run lemonade stands and other fundraising efforts. But if the money continues to be withheld come the fall, she will have to tell 25 families now in the program that their children will not be able to return. Many nonprofits are facing similar odds. "They can try and keep their doors open an extra few days and extra few weeks and maybe if they're lucky they have rainy day fund but you know that's a Band-Aid that isn't going to last forever," said Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, a national nonprofit advocacy organization. "If these funds are blocked, the fallout will be swift and devastating," said Jim Clark, president and CEO of the Boys & Girls Club of America, the nation's largest after-school youth program. Many sites are also in the midst of running their summer camps and programs, and nearly a fifth (17%) of the Boys and Girls Club network is funded by the 21st CCLC grant, according to the Afterschool Alliance. Up to 926 Boys & Girls Club centers, serving more than 220,000 kids, could be forced to close if the funds are not released, Clark said. Many of them are from underserved communities, and "will lose access to essential supports like healthy meals, caring mentors, and safe spaces during the most vulnerable hours of the day," he added. Addie Nardi, who runs a Boys & Girls Club in a rural part of Maryland about 90 minutes from Washington, DC, said the sudden funding freeze this month felt like "a kick to the gut"— but the shock was "secondary, almost, to the concern of how we were going to be able to continue to serve these kids." If the funds don't come through, the site will likely permanently close, leaving elementary students and their families without one of their only options for support in the area, Nardi said. There is no timeline for when the Department of Education review will be completed and if the money will ever start up again. The impetus for the pause came from the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which described it as part of an "ongoing programmatic review of education funding." In a statement, OMB raised concerns about how some of the funds may have been used by schools. "Initial findings show that many of these grant programs have been grossly misused to subsidize a radical leftwing agenda. In one case, NY public schools used English Language Acquisition funds to promote illegal immigrant advocacy organizations. In another, Washington state used funds to direct illegal immigrants towards scholarships intended for American students. In yet another, School Improvement funds were used to conduct a seminar on 'queer resistance in the arts.'" OMB did not provide documentation about their claims when asked by CNN. Grant, of Afterschool Alliance, says the move feels extreme. "Nobody even knows what they're reviewing," Grant said, "If there's a specific program that they're concerned about, they should be investigating that program but not holding up funding for all of these other kids across the country." Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers union, said the freeze of funds already approved by Congress for this summer is particularly damaging. The Department of Education's move is "hurting children and creating chaos," she said. Beyond the immediate threat to summer schools vying to stay open now, school districts and nonprofit education programs are bracing for more hardship into the school year. According toan analysis by the New America Foundation, a Washington, DC, think tank, school districts will lose an average of $220,289 if the funds continue to be withheld. Some stand to lose millions, with the poorest districts suffering the most. "Districts serving high-poverty student populations (those where over 25 percent of children live in poverty) will lose over five times as much funding per pupil as low-poverty school districts (those where fewer than 10 percent of children live in poverty)," according to New America's analysis. "The 100 school districts facing the biggest cuts on a per-pupil basis have an average child poverty rate of 24.4 percent, much higher than the national average of 15.3 percent." Many school districts work with outside organizations to use federal grants to run after-school care or offer academic support for children from low-income families. Aspire in Virginia, for example, runs after-school programs at a community center and two local schools that serve many low-income families. Ninety-nine percent of Aspire's students are from families of color, and more than 90% are living below the poverty line. Over three-quarters speak a language other than English at home. Colorful posters line the walls at the community center where Aspire holds its programs, available to kids from 3rd to 8th grade. In one room, an arts and crafts project making masks was taking place, and in another, it was "pirate day" where teachers dressed as pirates were fielding questions. Some students and former students who have come back as volunteers are serving snacks: On the day CNN visited, it was pineapples and blueberry muffins. The program regularly wraps up and discreetly sends home any leftovers to families in the program who would otherwise go without food. Kids who participate in the program earn points for academic and social achievements — and the difference it makes shows. "I feel, like, happy because I now, I know how to read," shared Monserrat, a little girl from Bolivia who is entering 4th grade in the fall. She joined Aspire a year ago, when her family moved to the US. She likes Aspire more than her regular school, she said, because she feels more competent and gets extra support. April, a rising 4th grader, said that Aspire helped her with her English, and now, she even helps translate for her parents. (April and Monserrat's parents asked that their last names not be used to protect their privacy.) When asked for thoughts on their experiences at Aspire, the girls raised both arms high above their heads, with two enthusiastic thumbs-up, flashing wide smiles. The states suing the Department of Education are asking the court to issue a preliminary injunction to unfreeze the funds immediately in at least some states. Fynboh said she fears the day Aspire will have to close. "Walking by an empty classroom every day is going to be hard," said Fynboh. "We know these kids and we know their parents, their faces, their names, their stories, their gifts, their talents, and we know which ones are going to lose access to the program. And that's just heartbreaking." This story has been updated with additional information. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Education Department funding freeze targets summer school and language programs that are lifelines for families

Education Department funding freeze targets summer school and language programs that are lifelines for families Desperation crept into Sylvi...
Mother accused of trafficking infant daughter on Snapchat for $400: ReportsNew Foto - Mother accused of trafficking infant daughter on Snapchat for $400: Reports

An Indianapolis mother is facing child sex trafficking charges for allegedly telling a stranger online that he could sexually assault her 7-month-old daughter for $400, multiple outlets reported, citing a probable cause affidavit. Morgan Stapp, 32, was arrested on July 8 and charged with attempt to commit child sex trafficking, Indiana court and Marion County inmate records reviewed by USA TODAY show. She was released from jail after posting a $100,000 bond, according to court records. USA TODAY contacted the Marion County Sheriff's Office and the Indianapolis Metro Police on Saturday, July 19, but has not received a response from either agency. Stapp's arrest comes after an FBI investigation that began in November 2024 once Snapchat reported attempted sex trafficking on their app, a probable cause affidavit obtained byCBS 4andPeoplesays. The mother of seven children, whose username was "morgan-stapp" on Snapchat, is accused of sending another user on the app three photos of her 7-month-old daughter, the court document reads, per the outlets. "U can (expletive) her for 400$," one message read. "Half now rest after. I'll send my address. I do live alone, and her dad is not in the picture." FBI agents spoke with Stapp on Nov. 11, 2024, and asked her about the messages, at which the mother told them that her Snapchat had recently been "hacked" and that she no longer had access to her "morgan-stapp" account, according to the affidavit. Stapp also told the agents that she'd recently received an email saying her Snapchat account was permanently banned due to "online commercial sex transactions," the court document continued, per the outlets. The mother expressed concern over losing photos of her kids that she had saved to her now-banned Snapchat account, according to the affidavit. When interviewed again later that month by the Indiana Department of Child Services, Stapp admitted to lying to FBI agents about being hacked out of her Snapchat account, the outlets reported, citing the affidavit. "I wanted the FBI to leave," she said, per the court document. The FBI contacted Indianapolis Metro police officers in December to help with their investigation. When a police detective got a search warrant for Stapp's account, he found selfies of her saved to Snapchat days after her FBI interview, which is when she claimed to have been hacked, according to the affidavit. Upon further investigation, detectives also discovered that Stapp's account sent over 7,000 messages on Snapchat during three days in November. Included in the messages was Snapp asking 81 times if other users would be "interested in buying my nudes so I can get baby diapers?" According to the affidavit, police said that IP address records from the "morgan-stapp" account indicated that all the Snapchat messages had been sent from an area near her home address in Indianapolis. Stapp's next court hearing is scheduled for Sept. 15, Indiana state records show. On Saturday, July 19, USA TODAY contacted the Indiana Public Defender's office, which is representing Stapp after she successfully filed for indigent status, but has not received a response. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Mom accused of using Snapchat to traffic child for $400, reports say

Mother accused of trafficking infant daughter on Snapchat for $400: Reports

Mother accused of trafficking infant daughter on Snapchat for $400: Reports An Indianapolis mother is facing child sex trafficking charges f...
Tensions rise as Lula blasts US over visa sanctions tied to Bolsonaro trialNew Foto - Tensions rise as Lula blasts US over visa sanctions tied to Bolsonaro trial

By Marcela Ayres BRASILIA (Reuters) -Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called a U.S. decision to impose visa bans on officials involved in former President Jair Bolsonaro's trial "arbitrary" and "baseless," and said foreign interference in the judiciary was "unacceptable." In a statement on Saturday, the leftist leader said the action violated fundamental principles of respect and sovereignty between nations. In an escalation of tensions between U.S. President Donald Trump and the government of Latin America's largest economy, Washington imposed visa restrictions on Friday on Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, his family and other unnamed court officials. The visa bans were a response to the Supreme Court's decision to issue search warrants and restraining orders targeting Trump ally Bolsonaro, who is accused of plotting a coup to overturn the results of a 2022 election he lost. "I am certain that no form of intimidation or threat, from anyone, will compromise the most important mission of Brazil's powers and institutions, which is to permanently defend and uphold the democratic rule of law," said Lula. Solicitor general Jorge Messias, the top judicial official for Lula's executive branch, said in a statement posted on X late Friday that Prosecutor General Paulo Gonet was also targeted by the ban. Messias said no "improper maneuver" or "sordid conspiratorial act" would intimidate the judiciary in carrying out its duties with independence, as he condemned what he also described as arbitrary U.S. visa revocations targeting Brazilian officials for fulfilling their constitutional responsibilities. In addition to Moraes, seven other justices from Brazil's 11-member Supreme Court were also hit by the U.S. visa restrictions, Government Institutional Relations Minister Gleisi Hoffmann said on Friday. They include justices Luis Roberto Barroso, Dias Toffoli, Cristiano Zanin, Flavio Dino, Carmen Lucia, Edson Fachin, and Gilmar Mendes. The Prosecutor General's Office and the Supreme Court did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump has criticised the proceedings against Bolsonaro as a "witch hunt", a term he has used to describe his own treatment by political opponents, and has called for the charges to be dropped. In a letter last week, he announced a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods starting August 1, opening the message with criticism of the trial. Bolsonaro is on trial before Brazil's Supreme Court on charges of plotting a coup to stop Lula from taking office in January 2023. The right-wing firebrand has denied that he led an attempt to overthrow the government but has acknowledged taking part in meetings aimed at reversing the election's outcome. (Reporting by Marcela Ayres; Editing by Joe Bavier and Diane Craft)

Tensions rise as Lula blasts US over visa sanctions tied to Bolsonaro trial

Tensions rise as Lula blasts US over visa sanctions tied to Bolsonaro trial By Marcela Ayres BRASILIA (Reuters) -Brazilian President Luiz I...
9 Wild Behind-the-Scenes Facts from "Mamma Mia! "(Including Which Two Stars Dated in Real Life!)

©Universal/courtesy Everett Collection Mamma Mia!originated as a jukebox musical in the West End in 1999 before the show made its way to Broadway in 2001. The film adaptation came in July 2008, with a star-studded cast at the helm. In the movie,Meryl Streepportrays Donna Sheridan, the manager of the hotel Villa Donna in Greece, and mother toAmanda Seyfried's character Sophie, who is set to get married to her fiancé, Sky. Donna hosts Sophie's wedding with the help of her friends, Tanya (Christine Baranski) and Rosie (Julie Walters), while Sophie cooks up a plan of her own. In an effort to discover the identity of her father, she invites three of her mom's exes to her wedding without Donna's knowledge: Sam Carmichael (Pierce Brosnan), Bill Anderson (Stellan Skarsgård) and Harry Bright (Colin Firth). Mamma Mia!was a box office success, earning $610 million worldwide, perBox Office Mojo. It went on to spawn a sequel in 2018,Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again,which followed a young Donna (Lily James), Tanya (Jessica Keenan Wynn) and Rosie (Alexa Davies) after their graduation from Oxford University. All the while, in the present day, Sophie is pregnant and preparing to reopen her mom's hotel after her death. From mishaps on set to the real-life bonds the cast formed, here are 9 behind-the-scenes facts you didn't know aboutMamma Mia!. ©Universal/courtesy Everett Collection While Brosnan has mastered the art of drama throughout his career, singing didn't come naturally tothe former Bond star. During a May 2025 interview withVanity Fair, headmitted to being "terrified" to sing inMamma Mia!, though his costars Firth and Skarsgård helped alleviate some of his fears. Reflecting on the recording of "SOS," Brosnan called it "a warhorse of a song." He explained, "It's not an easy song to sing, and I was mildly terrified. I remember going out to Air Studios to record the songs." The actor continued, "The only thing that kind of gave me some solace and some peace was to see Colin Firth and Stellan Skarsgård look as equally freaked out as I was as we sat down with Benny [Andersson] and Björn [Ulvaeus] and went straight into recording the songs." This gave Skarsgård the same amount of comfort, with the actor tellingVanity Fairin February 2024, "It was absurd to ask me to be in a musical. I can't sing, I can't dance. And then I saw it was also Pierce Brosnan and Colin Firth, and they can't sing and dance either, so I felt a little safer there." ©Universal/courtesy Everett Collection There's no shortage of entertainment for viewers when it comes toMamma Mia!and as it turns out, the cast had just as much filming the movie, too. Baranski opened up to PEOPLE in March 2025 about her experience filming the movie, explaining that it was just as "wonderful" behind-the-scenes as it was to see the final product. When asked what her favorite memory was of filming, the actress explained, "All of it. All of it. I mean, every night, and when we'd finish filming, we'd all go out together." Baranski added, "We would have the most wonderful time. It's the most wonderful group of people. We would all do it again because it was just a love affair." Amanda Seyfried/Instagram Ain't no party like aMamma Mia!wrap party. In March 2025, nearly two decades after the first movie, Seyfried shared somebehind-the-scenes details about the movie's wrap party, including a hilarious moment with her grandmother. "That was 18 years ago, I can't even do the math. But that wrap party specifically, I was drunk. Everybody was," she explained to PEOPLE. "My grandmother was at that wrap party and she was slightly drunk. She and my mom were there visiting. They always came everywhere I went and she lived until she was 99." ©Universal/courtesy Everett Collection Seyfried and Cooper, who portrayed the character Sky, met while they filmedMamma Mia!and then dated for several years until their split in 2011. Seyfried eventually met her now husband,Thomas Sadoski,while working on the off-Broadway playThe Way We Get Byin 2015. The couplemarried in 2017and havewelcomed two children together, Nina and Thomas. When Seyfried and Cooper both returned for the 2018Mamma Mia!sequel, Sadoskihad some thoughts about their on-screen reunion. Speaking toThe Mirrorin July 2018, Seyfried shared, "I think he has the same kind of issues that I would have if we were hanging out with his ex-girlfriend from long ago." "I think it's always like, 'I'm so in love with this person, so that person must be so in love with her too,' " she added. "I'd guess he assumed Dominic is in love with me the way he's in love with me. And it's just not the case, it's sweet. I'd rather he be jealous than completely fine with it." In addition to Seyfried's husband,Cher also had an opinionabout the actress' former relationship. Cooper toldVanity Fairin July 2018, "She took one look at me and didn't trust me at all—and told me so herself, which I laughed out loud at. After Amanda made it clear that we used to, once upon a time, be together, Cher said [to Seyfried], 'You dodged a bullet there.' " ©Universal/courtesy Everett Collection While singing didn't come naturally to the group of actors playing Sophie's potential fathers, neither did dancing. Baranskispoke about her experience onMamma Mia!during a May 2025 episode ofThe Late Show with Stephen Colbert,recalling that Skarsgård "hated" dancing in one particular scene. "We finally went down the hill and 'Dancing Queen' and landed on the dock," she explained. "Then it was the end of the number. The camera would move around, and it usually would avoid Stellan. Then finally, the director said, 'Stellan, okay, it's time for your close up. You have got to do the moves now. You have simply got to do the moves.' " Despite allegedly letting out "a string of expletives" and insisting he couldn't complete the task, Skarsgård did the choreography. Much like their camaraderie when it came to singing, Firth and Brosnanweren't far behind with their hatred for dancing, either. Baranski joked toVulturein February 2022, "Just to get them to sing the song and put one foot in front of another and raise a glass of beer together, it was like rocket science." ©Universal/courtesy Everett Collection There was only one name Brosnan needed to hear in order to sign onto the project: Meryl Streep. Brosnan spoke toVanity Fairin April 2025 about how the opportunity forMamma Mia!came to him. At the time, he shared, "My agent called me and said 'You've got a job with Meryl Streep.' I thought, 'Oh, my heavens, this is magnificent. This is incredible. Meryl Streep? They're really taking me seriously.' " "He said 'Yeah, it'sMamma Mia!' "Brosnan recalled. "I said, 'What?Mamma Mia!the musical?' He said, 'Yeah.' I said, 'Great. Where is it? How much?' And it was Greece." Brosnan admitted toVoguein September 2023 that the type of project wasn't something that would have typically been on his radar, telling the publication, "A musical was the last thing I had in mind for my career, so I was completely bowled over by the offer." He clarified, "But I was also over the moon to get to work with Meryl. Then, of course, I realized that meant I'd have to sing." Courtesy Everett Collection For yearsacross social media, fans have been convinced that the cast ofMamma Mia!were drunk on set due to ouzo, a Greek aperitif. However, Baranski set the record straight during a December 2020 interview withCollider, telling the outlet, "No, there wasn't ever Ouzo on set." "It was that Pierce Brosnan wanted to take us all to dinner one night near the end of the shoot – the firstMamma Mia!– and we had dinner and then we went to hear some jazz music somewhere," she explained. "And we started drinking this – it's not called Ouzo – it's Cipro or something. But that sounds like the antibiotic." The outlet confirmed the cast was drinking the spirit Tsipouro, not the antibiotic Cipro, as Baranski added, "None of us knew it, but this thing that we were drinking as though it was just really good tequila, gives you this hangover." "After, the next day, if you have even a little bit of water, it reactivates the effect of this drink," Baranski said. "I remember I didn't have to work the next day, but I had to keep reading the same paragraph ... I kept reading and rereading and nothing would stick ... whatever we were drinking, whoa, powerful stuff." ©Universal/courtesy Everett Collection Seyfried and Streep had a special bond to help portray their mother-daughter relationship on-screen. Speaking to theDaily Mailin November 2008, the director Phyllida Lloyd recalled a moment fromMamma Mia!when the actresses were singing "Slipping Through My Fingers," calling it a "very special song for all of us." "There was great tenderness between Meryl and Amanda and they both identified strongly with the scene," she explained. "We talked about all the things that might happen when a mother and daughter help each other get ready for a wedding, and I just let them improvise as Meryl painted Amanda's toenails." Streep also had a suggestion to make the scene even more powerful, with Lloyd adding, "It was Meryl who suggested that Amanda should sit on the chair with her. It was incredibly touching to watch them doing this scene." Photoshot/Everett Collection ABBA members Björn Ulvaeus and Benny Andersson not only composed the music forMamma Mia!the musical, but they also made cameos in both films. DuringMamma Mia!,Andersson appeared as a piano player on a boat during the "Dancing Queen" scene. Ulvaeus appeared during the end credits as a Greek god while the cast performed the tune "Waterloo." Read the original article onPeople

9 Wild Behind-the-Scenes Facts from “Mamma Mia! ”(Including Which Two Stars Dated in Real Life!)

9 Wild Behind-the-Scenes Facts from "Mamma Mia! "(Including Which Two Stars Dated in Real Life!) ©Universal/courtesy Everett Colle...
Colbert is latest casualty of late-night TV's fade-outNew Foto - Colbert is latest casualty of late-night TV's fade-out

By Dawn Chmielewski and Lisa Richwine LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Late-night television had been fighting for its survival even before "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" was canceled this week. The announced end of one of the most popular broadcast late-night shows, days after host Stephen Colbert accused the network owner of bribing President Donald Trump to approve a merger, drew cries of political foul play from liberal politicians, artists and entertainers. "Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late-night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO," Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, wrote on X. CBS executives said in a statement that dropping the show was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount." Whether or not politics were at play, the late-night format has been struggling for years, as viewers increasingly cut the cable TV cord and migrate to streaming. Younger viewers, in particular, are more apt to find amusement on YouTube or TikTok, leaving smaller, aging TV audiences and declining ad revenues. Americans used to religiously turn on Johnny Carson or Jay Leno before bed, but nowadays many fans prefer to watch quick clips on social media at their convenience. Advertising revenue for Colbert's show has dropped 40% since 2018 - the financial reality that CBS said prompted the decision to end "The Late Show" in May 2026. One former TV network executive said the program was a casualty of the fading economics of broadcast television. Fifteen years ago, a popular late-night show like "The Tonight Show" could earn $100 million a year, the executive said. Recently, though, "The Late Show" has been losing $40 million a year, said a person briefed on the matter. The show's ad revenue plummeted to $70.2 million last year from $121.1 million in 2018, according to ad tracking firm Guideline. Ratings for Colbert's show peaked at 3.1 million viewers on average during the 2017-18 season, according to Nielsen data. For the season that ended in May, the show's audience averaged 1.9 million. 'SHOCKED BUT NOT SURPRISED' Comedians like Colbert followed their younger audiences online, with the network releasing clips to YouTube or TikTok. But digital advertising did not make up for the lost TV ad revenue, the source with knowledge of the matter said. The TV executive said reruns of a hit prime-time show like "Tracker" would leave CBS with "limited costs, and the ratings could even go up." "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" is just the latest casualty of the collapse of one of television's most durable formats. When "The Late Late Show" host James Corden left in 2023, CBS opted not to hire a replacement. The network also canceled "After Midnight" this year, after host Taylor Tomlinson chose to return to full-time stand-up comedy. But the end came at a politically sensitive time. Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, is seeking approval from the Federal Communications Commission for an $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media. This month Paramount agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over a "60 Minutes" interview with his 2024 Democratic challenger, Kamala Harris. Colbert called the payment "a big fat bribe" two days before he was told his show was canceled. Many in the entertainment industry and Democratic politicians have called for probes into the decision, including the Writers Guild of America and Senator Edward Markey, who asked Paramount Chair Shari Redstone whether the Trump administration had pressured the company. Paramount has the right to fire Colbert, including for his political positions, Markey said, but "if the Trump administration is using its regulatory authority to influence or otherwise pressure your company's editorial decisions, the public deserves to know." A spokesperson for Redstone declined comment. "It's a completely new world that artists and writers and journalists are living in, and it's scary," said Tom Nunan, a veteran film and TV producer who is co-head of the producers program at UCLA's School of Theater, Film and Television. "When the news came in about Colbert, we were shocked but not surprised." (Reporting by Dawn Chmielewski and Lisa Richwine; Editing by Peter Henderson, William Mallard and Diane Craft)

Colbert is latest casualty of late-night TV's fade-out

Colbert is latest casualty of late-night TV's fade-out By Dawn Chmielewski and Lisa Richwine LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Late-night televisio...
Katy Perry Clings to Butterfly Prop amid Terrifying Moment It Malfunctions Mid-Air, Leaving Her Dangling Above CrowdNew Foto - Katy Perry Clings to Butterfly Prop amid Terrifying Moment It Malfunctions Mid-Air, Leaving Her Dangling Above Crowd

Don Arnold/WireImage; Theo Wargo/Getty Katy Perry's flying butterfly prop malfunctioned during her San Francisco show on Friday, July 18 The singer, 40, stopped singing "Roar" as she held onto the prop to prevent herself from falling into the crowd The mishap comes after she suffered another technical malfunction with a flying prop during a concert in June Katy Perrysuffered a terrifying prop malfunction during herLifetimes Tourperformance in San Francisco. On Friday, July 18, the "Fireworks" singer, 40, was sitting on a flying butterfly prop when it suddenly malfunctioned mid-air, causing her to almost fall into the audience at the Chase Center. Aclipof the scary moment posted on X shows Perry singing her song "Roar" while on the moving prop. It suddenly tilts and slightly drops, causing her to slip in her seat. She stops singing mid-lyric as horrified concertgoers watch from below. Perry appears visibly scared as she attempts to hold onto the prop before looking up at the wires attached to it and back down at the audience. She then raises her hand, appearing to signal that she's ok, as she continues to sing the song. In anothervideoshared on TikTok, the prop eventually starts moving again as Perry continues to sing the lyrics, "And you're going to hear me roar / Louder than a lion…" The PEOPLE Appis now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! Theo Wargo/Getty The singer later addressed the mishap on herInstagram Storieswith a blurry, close-up photo of her scared reaction to the malfunction with the caption, "Good Night San Fran," written over the top of the image. PEOPLE has reached out to Perry's representative for comment. The technical malfunction came after Perry suffereda prop malfunction while performingin Australia on June 29. Infan footageshared on X, Perry is seen preparing to be lifted over the audience inside a metallic sphere while holding onto some cables. After the handlers let go of the prop, the sphere rises and suddenly tilts to one side, causing Perry to lose her footing. She regains her balance by gripping the cables as the tilted sphere starts swinging. The handlers approach the sphere a few seconds later as it is lowered. Katy Perry/Instagram Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The series of mishaps follow anothermid-air malfunction in which fellow artist Beyoncéwas left dangling during her Cowboy Carter show in Houston. Perry kicked off her LifeTimes Tour promoting her album143on April 23. She is set to perform next in Seattle on July 21, before heading to Canada, then Europe and South America up until the world tour concludes on Dec. 7. Read the original article onPeople

Katy Perry Clings to Butterfly Prop amid Terrifying Moment It Malfunctions Mid-Air, Leaving Her Dangling Above Crowd

Katy Perry Clings to Butterfly Prop amid Terrifying Moment It Malfunctions Mid-Air, Leaving Her Dangling Above Crowd Don Arnold/WireImage; T...

 

LEX MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com