The best movies of 2025 so farNew Foto - The best movies of 2025 so far

The year started a little quietly, but come spring, the box office was in full swing with hits includingA Minecraft Movie,Sinners, and Marvel's introduction of the "new Avengers" inThunderbolts*. Audiences have been treated to a few live-action remakes of animated favorites:Lilo & Stitch,How to Train Your Dragon, andSnow White. And AI technology has been at the center of movies includingCompanion,M3GAN 2.0, andMission: Impossible —The Final Reckoning,Tom Cruise's eighth (and last?) in the franchise. But what are the movies that have risen above all the others as the best of 2025 so far? Here areEntertainment Weekly's top 10, in alphabetical order. Want more movie news? Sign up forEntertainment Weekly's free newsletterto get the latest trailers, celebrity interviews, film reviews, and more. Miya Mizuno/Sony Pictures Entertainment 28 Years Later, which reteams directorDanny Boylewith screenwriterAlex Garlandafter both sidestepped to producer roles for the 2007 sequel28 Weeks Later, shows both men working at the peak of their powers — and in absolute sicko mode. This new chapter (starringAaron Taylor-Johnson,Jodie Comer,Ralph Fiennes, and Alfie Williams) is strange, unpredictable, gloriously revolting, darkly funny, and, when you least expect it, rather touching. It's a full package, and one of the richest horror movies in a very long time.—Jordan Hoffman Read EW's review of28 Years Later. Alistair Heap/Courtesy of Sundance Institute This little gem of a movie premiered at Sundance in January before landing quietly in theaters in March. Written by British comedy duo Tom Basden and Tim Key, it follows eccentric lottery winner Charles Heath (Key), who seeks to reunite beloved folk duo Herb McGwyer (Basden) and Nell Mortimer (Carey Mulligan). What starts as a misguided attempt to bring the band back together only dredges up old wounds, but it turns out to be a beautiful way for Charles to process his grief and feel closer to his late wife. It's a lilting, charmingly funny, touching meditation on love, loss, and finding our way back to ourselves.—Maureen Lee Lenker Claudette Barius/Focus Features Black Bagis a spy film unlike any other. When intelligence agent George Woodhouse (Michael Fassbender) learns his wife, Kathryn (Cate Blanchett), also a spy, is suspected of betraying the nation, he must decide between his country and his marriage. Despite its refreshingly short runtime (just over 90 minutes!), the film deftly packs a lot in. Gone are the usual prolonged, fiery action sequences, and in their place are talky — but no less fraught — games of cat-and-mouse at an elegant dinner table. And there are enough twists and turns to keep you guessing, but the film's true (dare we say?)secretweapon is that, at its heart,Black Bagis really about a marriage brought enchantingly to life by the mesmerizing hot, hot, hot chemistry between Fassbender and Blanchett, who go toe-to-toe in ways that make it impossible to look away. Go on, we dare you. —Lauren Huff Warner Bros. Pictures Genre storytelling has always been a ripe space for exploring potent social and political issues, andCompanionis no exception, even if its message gets muddled at times. Drew Hancock's feature directorial debut is a hell of an invigorating revenge fantasy, made all the more satisfying by its own winking self-awareness. Bathed in a pink-pop glow, its pastiche of romance and horror collide in a viciously mischievous parable of technology and control that speaks to these most anxious times.—Maureen Lee Lenker Read EW's review ofCompanion. Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures/Apple Original Films F1literally just drove into theaters, and it already pushed, pushed, pushed its way onto this list — for good reason. DirectorJoseph Kosinski's love letter to Formula One racing starringBrad Pittisn't just one of the best films of the year (so far), it's also one of the best sports competition movies ever made. Despite the often-predictable limitations of the genre, Ehren Kruger's script avoids feeling formulaic (sorry). The story, the action, and the editing are all crisp and pitch-perfect, set to an appropriately pulse-pounding soundtrack and score (created by the inimitableHans Zimmer, of course). In short: It rules! The best part? It doesn't matter whether you're an F1 superfan who can name every single background cameo (of which there aremany), or you have no idea what "box, box" means — this is the ultimate summer blockbuster for audiences looking for a breathtaking, globe-trotting, edge-of-your-seat drama. Buckle up … but watch your speed while driving home from the theater.—Sydney Bucksbaum Read EW's review ofF1. NEON WithLife of Chuck, directorMike Flanagansteps away from horror — but not fromStephen King. The adaptation of King's 2020 novella tells the story of Charles "Chuck" Krantz, an accountant whose life is cut heartbreakingly short at 39 from a brain tumor. But it's far from a straightforward story. The movie's three acts, told in reverse chronological order, weave in sci-fi, fantasy, and supernatural elements that may have you scratching your head at the beginning and tearing up by the end. It's hard to say much more about the film without giving awaythe twist— but we can tell you it's worth watching for starTom Hiddleston'sfive-and-a-half-minute dance numberalone.—Ashley Boucher Courtesy of Sundance Institute Another Sundance darling,Marlee Matlin: Not Alone Anymoretells the story of deaf actressMarlee Matlinand her struggles as a child born to hearing parents to making history as the first deaf actor to win an Oscar and beyond. Director and producer Shoshannah Stern is also deaf, which allows her to tell Matlin's story from the deaf perspective. Using American Sign Language and subtitles throughout, as well as her own onscreen conversations with Matlin, Stern foregrounds the deaf experience in her filmmaking, making it not just a compelling portrait of a groundbreaking artist but an innovative approach to documentary storytelling on the whole.—Maureen Lee Lenker Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures The most talked-about movie of the year, and for good reason.Ryan Coogler'sSinnerssank its teeth into our necks in April and hasn't let go since. Set in 1930s Mississippi, and loosely inspired by the director's family's real-life experiences in the Jim Crow South, the film is much more than your typical vampire story. In fact, the vamps don't even show their real fangs until the third act, which culminates in a fiery, blood-soaked showdown of epic proportions. Instead, we spend most of our time with not one but twoMichael B. Jordans, playing twins Smoke and Stack, two prodigal sons returned home from Chicago with plans to open a juke joint for the local community. Sexy, scary, and seductive, the film explores themes of race, ancestry, and violence, all set to the propulsive blues music that forms its beating heart.—Mike Miller A24 Perhaps you're one of the many who became a fan ofEva Victorover the last 10 years because of her satirical, deeply funny tweets and viral videos. Her feature directorial debutSorry, Baby, in which she also stars and wrote, is rife with her sharp humor, all layered throughout a profound examination of a traumatic event that forever changes her character, Agnes. The laughs are a necessary tool — coping mechanism, even — to help Agnes move through life as she navigates a myriad emotions. It's complicated and unassuming in the same beat, making this Sundance favorite one of the most thoughtful and unforgettable of the year.—Gerrad Hall Courtesy of Marvel Studios We get it, "superhero fatigue" is a real thing. But superheroes, the Thunderbolts are not — and that is part of the reason Marvel's latest is one of its best in years. Centered onFlorence Pugh's Yelena Belova, who we find lost, depressed, and ready to get out of the assassin business, she leads an unlikely new team of antiheroes to face down the person trying to take them out — while also facing their own inner demons. The unexpected emotional gut punch, along with huge laughs and exciting action, easily makes this one of the best trips to theaters this year. By now you hopefully know thatthe asterisk of the title isNew Avengers, and we can't wait to see Yelena, Bucky Barnes/the Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan), U.S. Agent/John Walker (Wyatt Russell), Alexei Shostakov/Red Guardian (David Harbour), and Ava Starr/Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen) lead the franchise into its next phase.—Gerrad Hall Read EW's review ofThunderbolts*. Read the original article onEntertainment Weekly

The best movies of 2025 so far

The best movies of 2025 so far The year started a little quietly, but come spring, the box office was in full swing with hits includingA Min...
Slander or 'trash-talking'? Drake-Kendrick Lamar feud has a day in courtNew Foto - Slander or 'trash-talking'? Drake-Kendrick Lamar feud has a day in court

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge is pondering the nature of rap battles and the cutting wordplay inKendrick Lamar's "Not Like Us," the megahit diss track that spurred adefamation lawsuitfrom his fellow superstarDrake. Drake sued Universal Music Group — both his and Lamar's record label — over "Not Like Us," saying the company published and promoted a song he deems slanderous. Universal says the lyrics are just hyperbole in the tradition of rap beefing, and the label is trying to get the case dismissed. Judge Jeannette Vargas didn't immediately decide after a lively hearing Monday, when the raw creativity ofhip-hopbrushed up against the staid confines of federal court. "Who is the ordinary listener? Is it someone who's going to catch all those references?" Vargas wondered aloud, addressing a legal standard that concerns how an average, reasonable person would understand a statement. "There's so much specialized and nuanced to these lyrics." Neither artist attended the hearing. The case stems from anepic feudbetween two of hip-hop's biggest stars over one of 2024 biggest songs — the one that won therecord of the year and song of the year Grammys, got the most Apple Music streams worldwide and helped make this winter'sSuper Bowl halftime showthe most watched ever. Released as the two artists were trading a flurry of insult tracks, Lamar's song calls out the Canadian-born Drake by name and impugns his authenticity, branding him "a colonizer" of rap culture who's "not like us" inLamar's home turfof Compton, California, and, more broadly, West Coast rap. "Not Like Us" also makes insinuations about Drake's sex life, including "I hear you like 'em young" — implications that he rejects. Drake's suit says that the song amounts to "falsely accusing him of being a sex offender, engaging in pedophilic acts" and more. Contending that the track endangered him by fanning notions of vigilante justice, the suit blames "Not Like Us" not only for harming Drake's image but for attempted break-ins and the shooting of a security guard at his Toronto home. The mansion was depicted in an aerial photo in the song's cover art. "This song achieved a cultural ubiquity unlike any other rap song in history," Drake lawyer Michael Gottlieb said. He argued that Universal had campaigned and contrived to make it "a de facto national anthem" that didn't just address hip-hop fans who knew the backstory and were accustomed to over-the-top lyrical battling. The average listener could be "a 13-year-old who's dancing to the song at a bar mitzvah," Gottlieb suggested. "That would be a very interesting bar mitzvah," the judge opined. (The song has indeed been played at some such celebrations.) Universal, meanwhile, has emphasized that "Not Like Us" was part of an exchange of barbs between Drake and Lamar. "Context is key," label lawyer Rollin Ransom argued Monday, at one point apologizing for having to use profanity while reciting some of the lyrics Drake aimed at Lamar in a track called "Taylor Made Freestyle." "What you hear in these rap battles is trash-talking in the extreme, and it is not, and should not be treated as, statements of fact," the attorney said. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages. Drake also went after iHeartMedia, claiming in a Texaslegal petitionthat the radio giant got illegal payments from Universal to boost airplay for "Not Like Us." IHeartMedia hasdenied any wrongdoing. That disputewas resolvedin March. Drake hasn't sued Lamar himself.

Slander or 'trash-talking'? Drake-Kendrick Lamar feud has a day in court

Slander or 'trash-talking'? Drake-Kendrick Lamar feud has a day in court NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge is pondering the nature of ...
No verdict on first day of jury deliberations at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trialNew Foto - No verdict on first day of jury deliberations at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial

NEW YORK (AP) — Jury deliberations got underway on Monday in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial and hit a snag almost as soon as they started. But, by the end of the day, jurors indicated they were making progress weighing complex charges that could put the hip-hop mogul in prison for life. The first day of deliberations saw a flurry of notes from the jury and Combs and his supporters bowing their heads in prayer in the courtroom — but no verdict. The juryof eight men and four women are sifting through seven weeks of sometimes graphic and emotional testimony about therap, fashion and reality TV impresario's propensity for violence and his sexual predilections, including drug-fueled sex marathons dubbed "freak-offs" or "hotel nights." About an hour in, the foreperson reported that a juror might be having trouble following the 61 pages worth of instructions the judge had just read to them. "We are concerned (the juror) cannot follow your honor's instructions," the foreperson said in a note to Judge Arun Subramanian just after 12:30 p.m. After the judge originally proposed asking the jury foreperson the nature of concerns about the fellow juror, defense lawyer Marc Agnifilo suggested caution and that it was better to say less than more. "We can always ratchet it up. We can't ratchet it down," Agnifilo said. Subramanian sent his response to the jury around 2 p.m., reminding the panel to deliberate and to follow his instructions on the law. The jury sent another note about three hours later asking for clarification on the part of the instructions addressing drug distribution — an allegation included in Combs' racketeering conspiracy charge. As deliberations were happening, Combs prayed with his family and friends in the courtroom. Wearing his customary sweater and khakis, he stood facing his contingent in the audience and bowed his head with them. As they finished, they applauded, along with Combs. Combs also showed off two books he's reading: "The Power of Positive Thinking," by Norman Vincent Peale and "The Happiness Advantage," by Shawn Achor. As he sent the jury to deliberate, Subramanian told the five alternate jurors to remain on standby at home in case they're needed at a later point. Jurors were provided with a laptop loaded with all of the exhibits shown in court, including text messages, photographs and videos of the sexual encounters at the heart of the case. Combs, 55, haspleaded not guiltyto federal charges of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking — relating to two of his ex-girlfriends — and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for allegedly arranging to fly his girlfriends and sex workers across state lines. In closing arguments last week, federal prosecutors and Combs' defense team took their last shots at convincing jurors to convict or acquit the Grammy Award-winning founder of Bad Boy Records. "The defendant used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,"Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik said. "He thought that his fame, wealth and power put him above the law." She said that he used his "close inner circle and a small army of personal staff, who made it their mission to meet the defendant's every desire, promote his power and protect his reputation at all costs." Defense lawyer Marc Agnifilocountered, "This isn't about crime. It's about money." He noted that one of Combs' accusers in the criminal case also sued him in civil court. "He is not a racketeer. He is not a conspirator to commit racketeering. He is none of these things. He is innocent. He sits there innocent. Return him to his family, who have been waiting for him," the lawyer told jurors. In all, 34 witnesses testified, headlined by Combs' former girlfriendsCassie— the R&B singer born Casandra Ventura — and "Jane," who testified under a pseudonym. Both women said he often was violent toward them. Cassie said he forced her into hundreds of sexual encounters with paid male sex workers while Jane recounted numerous "hotel nights." Jurors also saw now-infamoussecurity camera videoof Combs beating, kicking and dragging Cassie at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 and clips from videos of sexual encounters. Combschose not to testify, and his lawyers didn't call any witnesses in their defense case. His attorneys elected instead to challenge the accusers' credibility during lengthy cross-examination questioning. The defense has acknowledged that Combs veered into violence, buthis lawyers maintainthat the sex acts were consensual. They contend that prosecutors are intruding in Combs' personal life and that he's done nothing to warrant the charges against him.

No verdict on first day of jury deliberations at Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ sex trafficking trial

No verdict on first day of jury deliberations at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial NEW YORK (AP) — Jury deliberations go...
Judges consider whether Trump can use wartime act against Venezuelan gang Tren de AraguaNew Foto - Judges consider whether Trump can use wartime act against Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua

Immigrationand administration lawyers on Monday battled over whether PresidentDonald Trumpcan use an 18th century wartime act against a Venezuelan gang in a case that is likely to ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The attorneys sparred before a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, the latest step in a tangled legal battle over Trump's March invocation of theAlien Enemies Act of 1798against theTren de Araguagang. The law has only previously been used during World Wars I and II and the War of 1812. ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt told the three-judge panel that Trump's use of it is inappropriate. "This has only been invoked three times in major, major wars, and now it's being invoked in connection with a gang," Gelernt said. Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign, arguing for the administration, said that courts cannot second-guess a president's determination that the U.S. faces a threat from abroad and requires extraordinary measures to protect itself. He noted that the only time the high court weighed in on the act was in a case that dates from after fighting in Europe ended in World War II, when the court said it could not second-guess then-President Harry Truman's assertion that suspected Nazis should still be held under the act because the war was still continuing. "The president is due the utmost deference" in matters of foreign affairs and security, Ensign said. Trump's invocation has already been twice before the nation's highest court on more technical issues. First,the court foundthat those accused of being TdA members deserved a "reasonable" amount of time to challenge that designation in court, but that their deportations could only be challenged in the locations they were held. That eliminated a national bar against deportations under the act issued by a federal judge in Washington, who later foundthe administration possibly committed contemptwhen itdisregarded his ordersand continued to fly some held under the AEA to a prison in El Salvador. Then, after the ACLU and its allies began filing suits all around the country and winning rulings barring deportations under the measure, the high court stepped in a second time. In April it issuedan unusual post-midnight rulingstopping the administration from deporting people from a slice of north Texas where there was yet no active ruling against removal. Asmultiple lower court judgesfound the AEA couldn't be used against a gang, the high court directed the 5th Circuit to consider the issue and how much time those held should have to challenge their designation. The government, which initially provided minimal notice, now says the standard should be seven days to file an appeal. The ACLU argued for 30 days, the amount of time given to suspected Nazis held during World War II. The panel that heard Monday's arguments was comprised of one judge appointed by Trump, one by former President George W. Bush and one by Biden. Whatever it rules can be appealed to either the entire 5th circuit — one of the most conservative federal appeals courts in the country — or directly to the high court. Trump has argued that TdA is acting at the behest of Venezuela's government. The Act allows its use to combat either an "invasion" or a "predatory incursion." But the ACLU argues that the connection between the gang and the Venezuelan government is tangential at best, and that an assessment by 17 different intelligence agencies found little coordination between TdA and the government in Caracas. Gelernt contended that, by the standards laid out by the administration, the AEA could have been used against the mafia or any other criminal organization with tangential ties to other countries that has operated in the United States over the past 200 years.

Judges consider whether Trump can use wartime act against Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua

Judges consider whether Trump can use wartime act against Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua Immigrationand administration lawyers on Monday bat...
Satellite imagery reveals ongoing work at Iranian nuclear site bombed by USNew Foto - Satellite imagery reveals ongoing work at Iranian nuclear site bombed by US

New satellite images show continuing work at Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment plant, which was struck by US B-2 bombers just over a week ago. The imagery was collected by Maxar Technologies on Sunday. Maxar said it "reveals ongoing activity at and near the ventilation shafts and holes caused by last week's airstrikes on the Fordow fuel enrichment complex." The pictures show "an excavator and several personnel are positioned immediately next to the northern shaft on the ridge above the underground complex. The crane appears to be operating at the entrance to the shaft/hole." According to Maxar, several additional vehicles are also seen below the ridge and are parked along the path that was built to access the site. Earlier this month, American B-2 bombers dropped more than a dozen bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites, while Tomahawk missiles launched from a US submarine hit theIsfahan sitein central Iran. The US Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs targeted the two ventilation shafts at Fordow, according to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine. He told a Pentagon briefing last week that most of the bombs dropped at Fordow "were tasked to enter the main shaft, move down into the complex at greater than 1,000 feet per second, and explode in the mission space." Former nuclear inspector David Albright, who now leads the Institute for Science and International Security, said that imagery from Fordow on Saturday showed "the Iranians are actively working at the two MOP impact sites penetrating the ventilation shafts" at the plant. Albright assessed that the activity "may include backfilling the craters, as well as conducting engineering damage assessments and likely radiological sampling. The craters above the main shafts remain open." "We have observed that the Iranians have also rapidly repaired the bomb cratering damage on the main entrance road from only a few days prior. However, there are yet no indications of any efforts to reopen any of the tunnel entrances," Albrightposted on X. On Sunday, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said US strikes on Iranfell short of causing total damageto its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium "in a matter of months," contradicting President Donald Trump's claims the US set Tehran's ambitions back by decades. The comments by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency,first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States' strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months. While the final military and intelligence assessment has yet to come, Trump has repeatedly claimed to have "completely and totally obliterated" Tehran's nuclear program. CNN's Laura Sharman and Sophie Tanno contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Satellite imagery reveals ongoing work at Iranian nuclear site bombed by US

Satellite imagery reveals ongoing work at Iranian nuclear site bombed by US New satellite images show continuing work at Iran's Fordow n...

 

LEX MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com