Blocked from Bolivia's election, ex-leader Morales not sure how to respond to threats of arrestNew Foto - Blocked from Bolivia's election, ex-leader Morales not sure how to respond to threats of arrest

LAUCA Ñ, Bolivia (AP) — Bolivia's charismatic, long-servingex-President Evo Moralestold The Associated Press on Saturday that he didn't know what to do about threats by the right-wing presidential candidates to arrest him if they came to power. From his stronghold in Bolivia's tropics of Chapare, where he has been holed up for months under the protection of die-hard supporters, he repeated his call for voters to deface their ballots in Sunday's high-stakes elections in defiance of the race from which he is barred due to a contentious constitutional court ruling. "What are we going to do? Not even I know," he said in response to questions about how he would respond if either of the right-wing front-runners, multimillionaire businessman Samuel Doria Medina and former president Jorge "Tuto" Quiroga, wins the presidential election and fulfills their threats to arrest him. "I am in the crosshairs of of the right-wing empire." Morales, 65, was charged last year with human trafficking and accused of impregnating a 15-year-old girl when he was president. While he has not outright denied having sexual relations with the underage girl, he has described the charges as politically motivated. A judge issued the arrest order as he and his former finance minister,President Luis Arce, bickered over the control of their long-dominant Movement Toward Socialism Party. As a result of their bitter power struggle, the party splintered. With the Bolivian economy undergoing its worst crisis in around four decades, the implosion of the MAS party has given the right-wing opposition its best shot at winning at the ballot box since Morales first came to power in 2006. "Look, it's an election without legality, without legitimacy .... without the Indigenous movement, without the popular movement," Morales, Bolivia's first Indigenous president, contended in his interview with the AP at his political organization's headquarters, where he broadcasts a weekly radio show. The null-and-void vote, he said, "isn't just a vote for our political movement." "It's a protest vote, a vote of anger." He insulted Doria Medina and Quiroga, who have both run for president three times before, losing at least twice to Morales, as "eternal losers." Citing widespread voter disillusionment with the options, he expressed confidence that the election outcome would reveal an unusually high proportion of invalid votes. "No one is going to win. It will be the spoiled vote, which is Evo's vote," he said, speaking in third person.

Blocked from Bolivia's election, ex-leader Morales not sure how to respond to threats of arrest

Blocked from Bolivia's election, ex-leader Morales not sure how to respond to threats of arrest LAUCA Ñ, Bolivia (AP) — Bolivia's ch...
This military junta is rebranding itself to hold elections. But a UN probe has found evidence of intensifying atrocitiesNew Foto - This military junta is rebranding itself to hold elections. But a UN probe has found evidence of intensifying atrocities

As evidence mounts of intensifying atrocities, including the torture of children, being committed in Myanmar, the country's military generals are rebranding their junta regime and planning stage-managed elections in a nation they only control parts of. They've rescinded a four-year state of emergency order, imposed during their 2021 military coup, and formed a caretaker administration to govern the war-torn Southeast Asian country until a new parliament is assembled following a national vote. But it is merely a cosmetic change, analysts say — designed to give the appearance that it's playing by the democratic playbook while remaining firmly in power, something Myanmar's military have a long and notorious history of doing. The election, to be held in stages over December 2025 and January 2026, is resoundingly regarded as a sham and a tool used by the junta to give it aveneer of legitimacyas it seeks to entrench its rule and gain international recognition. The junta's notoriety, though, is only growing. UN investigators have gathered evidence of systemic torture against those detained by the military, summary executions of captured combatants or civilians accused of being informers, children as young as two being detained in place of their parents, and aerial attacks on schools, homes and hospitals. Here's what to know: For more than four years, Myanmar's military rulers have waged a brutal civil war across the country, sending columns of troops onbloody rampages,torchingand bombing villages,massacringresidents,jailing opponentsand forcing young men and women tojoin the army. The United Nations and other rights groups have accused the military of war crimes as it battles democracy fighters and longstanding ethnic armed groups to cling to power. At the head of this junta is Sen. Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, the army chief who seized power in 2021, overthrowing the democratically elected government of Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi and installed himself as leader. The military, which had previously ruled Myanmar with an iron fist for decades, sought to justify its takeover by alleging widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, which was won in a landslide by Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy Party. The claims were never substantiated. Min Aung Hlaing has been sanctioned and spurned by the West, the country's economy is in tatters, and his military has lost significant territory in its grinding, multi-front civil war. The UN's Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar has said that the "frequency and intensity" of atrocities in the country has only escalated over the past year. Children as young as two years old were often detained in place of their parents and some were also abused and tortured, the group found. It has collected evidence of "systemic torture" in the military-run detention facilities, including rape and other forms of sexual violence. Some detainees died as a result of the torture, according to the IIMM. Those responsible include specific members and units of security forces involved in operations as well as high-ranking commanders, according to the group. The military has repeatedly denied committing atrocities and says it is targeting "terrorists." The junta has not responded to media requests for comment. The junta said its election objectives are for a "genuine, disciplined multiparty democratic system and the building of a union based on democracy and federalism." But with most of the country's pro-democracy lawmakers in exile or jail, and the military's widespread repression and attacks on the people, such a vote would never be considered free or fair, observers say. "It's a sham election… It's not inclusive, it's not legitimate," Mi Kun Chan Non, a women's activist working with Myanmar's Mon ethnic minority, told CNN. Many observers have warned that Min Aung Hlaing is seeking to legitimize his power grab through the ballot box and rule through proxy political parties. "He needs to make himself legitimate … He thought that the election is the only way (to do that.)," said Mi Kun Chan Non. The United States and most Western countries have never recognized the junta as the legitimate government of Myanmar, and the election has been denounced by several governments in the region - including Japan and Malaysia. A collective of internationalelection expertssaid a genuine election in Myanmar "is impossible under the current conditions," in a joint statement released by the umbrella organization International Idea. The experts pointed to "draconian legislation banning opposition political parties, the arrest and detention of political leaders and democracy activists, severe restrictions of the media, and the organization of an unreliable census by the junta as a basis for the voter list." Others say they cannot trust the military when it continues its campaign of violence, and when its history is littered with false promises of reform. Details on the election process are thin, but many citizens could be casting their votes in an active conflict zone or under the eyes of armed soldiers – a terrifying prospect that some say could lead to more violence. Junta bombs have destroyed homes, schools, markets, places of worship and hospitals, and are a primary cause of the displacement of more than 3.5 million people across the country since the coup. There are fears that those in junta-controlled areas will be threatened or coerced into voting. And some townships may never get to vote, given the junta's lack of control over large swathes of the country outside its heartland and major cities. One of the country's most powerful ethnic armed groups, the Arakan Army, has said it will not allow elections to be held in territories it controls, which includes most of western Rakhine state. unknown content item - And the National Unity Government, an exiled administration which considers itself the legitimate government of Myanmar, has urged the people to "oppose and resist" participating in the poll, saying the junta "does not have the right or authority to conduct elections." There are also signs the military is moving to consolidate its power in those parts of the country it does not control. As it rescinded the nationwide state of emergency, it also imposed martial law in more than 60 townships – giving the military increased powers in resistance strongholds. "The military has been pushing hard to reclaim the territories it has lost, but regaining consolidated control — especially in the lead-up to the elections — will be a near impossibility within such a short timeframe," said Ye Myo Hein, a senior fellow at the Southeast Asia Peace Institute, based in Washington DC. "Instead, holding elections amid this perilous context is likely to trigger even greater violence and escalate conflict nationwide." Already, there are moves to further quash dissent ahead of the poll. A new law criminalizes criticism of the election, threatening long prison sentences for those opposing or disrupting the vote. And a new cybercrime law expands the regime's online surveillance powers, banning unauthorized use of VPNs and targeting users who access or share content from prohibited social media sites. Min Aung Hlaing recently formed a new governing body, the National Security and Peace Commission (NSPC), replacing the previous State Administration Council. The junta chief also has added chairman of the new regime to the roster of titles he now holds, which includes acting President and chief of the armed forces. And the new interim administration is stacked with loyalists and active military officers. The move was "nothing more than an old trick — putting old wine in a new bottle," said Ye Myo Hein. "The military has used such tactics many times throughout its history to create the illusion of change… The military junta, led by Min Aung Hlaing, remains firmly in the driver's seat." It has been here before. Myanmar has been governed by successive military regimes since 1962, turning a once prosperous nation into an impoverished pariah state home to some of the world's longest running insurgencies. In 2008, the military regime pushed ahead with constitutional reform that paved the way for a semi-civilian government to take power, while preserving its significant influence on the country's politics. What followed was a decade of limited democratic reform and freedoms that brought greater foreign investment –- including the return of global brands like Coca-cola – and engagement with western nations. A generation of young Myanmar nationals began to dream of a different future to their parents and grandparents, as investment and opportunities poured in. But the military never really gave up political power. When state counselor Aung San Suu Kyi's party stormed to a second term victory in the 2020 election, it came as a surprise to some military figures, who hadhopedtheir own proxy party might take power democratically. The former democracy icon was detained during a coup the following year, tried by a military court and sentenced to 27 years in prison. The 80-year-old's exact whereabouts is still a tightly guarded secret, and the junta has sought to ensure Suu Kyi and her popular, but now dissolved, NLD party would be politically wiped out. By presenting itself as a civilian government, analysts say the military will also try to convince some countries to normalize ties. Russia and China are two of Myanmar's biggest backers, and Thailand and India have pushed for more engagement with the junta to end the crisis on their borders. China's foreign ministry last Thursday said it "supports Myanmar's development path in line with its national conditions and Myanmar's steady advancement of its domestic political agenda." In recent weeks, Min Aung Hlaing had unexpectedly good news from the US. A letter from the Trump administration detailing its new tariff rates wasspun domesticallyby the junta leader as increased engagement. Then, the Trump administration dropped sanctions on several companies and individuals responsible for supplying weapons to Myanmar, prompting outcry from the UN Special Rapporteur for Myanmar Tom Andrews who called the moved "unconscionable and a major step backward for efforts to save innocent lives." Myanmar's Ministry of Information has also signed a $3 million a year deal with Washington lobbying firm DCI Group to help rebuild relations with the US, Reuters news agency recently reported. The group, as well as the US Treasury Department, the US State Department, and Myanmar's Washington embassy did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Democracy supporters opposed to the junta have warned the international community against falling for the military's election plan, and say such a poll will never be accepted by the people. Min Aung Hlaing and his junta "have sucked all the resources and money than can and the country has nothing left," said Mi Kun Chan Non, the women's activist. "Everything has fallen apart … The education system has collapsed; the healthcare system has collapsed. Business is just for the cronies." So, any future peace negotiations that follow the elections, "we can never trust," she said. "And the situation of the people on the ground will not change." For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

This military junta is rebranding itself to hold elections. But a UN probe has found evidence of intensifying atrocities

This military junta is rebranding itself to hold elections. But a UN probe has found evidence of intensifying atrocities As evidence mounts ...
Hundreds arrested as Trump's Washington, DC, crime crackdown hits full strideNew Foto - Hundreds arrested as Trump's Washington, DC, crime crackdown hits full stride

The Trump administration's crackdown on violent crime in Washington, D.C., has already netted more than 240 arrests and taken 38 guns off the streets, a White House official told Fox News. The show of force has swept up gang members, robbery suspects andimmigration violators. On Friday alone, 52 people were arrested, including 28 illegal immigrants, while three guns were seized. Federal teams also cleared 25 homeless encampments, and officials said those removals were carried out without confrontations or arrests. Expert Flips Script On Dems Pushing 'Cherry-picked' Crime Stats To Resist Trump's Dc Crackdown White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller hailed the scale of the operations and said the numbers are "breathtaking." "We have seen a record number of violent offenders, bad guys, gang members and all kinds of threats to public safety removed off the streets as well as their illegal weapons that they've been using to terrorize the citizens of this city," Miller told "Fox News Live." Read On The Fox News App "Additionally, we have seen over 70 homeless encampments that have scarred and disfigured the public streets of this city, dismantled and thrown away and the homeless cleared from those encampments. At the same time, we have the National Park Service going around and getting rid of the gang graffiti that has been left untouched by this city for decades." The operation began quietly Aug. 7 with the launch of the "Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful" task force created by PresidentDonald Trumpin March through an executive order. He escalated it Aug. 11 by temporarily seizing federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under emergency powers in the Home Rule Act, the first such move in U.S. history. Woman Gunned Down In 'Safe' Dc Neighborhood As Trump Launches Federal Police Takeover The order puts the MPD under federal authority for up to 30 days, unless Congress extends it, and 800 National Guard troops were deployed. In all, 22 multi-agency teams with more than 1,800 personnel were deployed across all seven police districts as the president vowed to aggressively "take our capital back." "We have a capital that's very unsafe. … Something's out of control. But we're going to put it in control very quickly," Trump said Monday. Other arrests included drug distribution, weapons violations and outstanding warrants. Police also detained suspects accused of fleeing law enforcement, reckless driving, assault with a dangerous weapon and kidnapping. The D.C. National Guard carried out roving patrols on foot and in vehicles around the National Mall and Union Station last night. While they remain armed, the officials stressed they are not making arrests, instead securing federal assets and providing cover for police. Trump began floating the idea of federalizing D.C. law enforcement after the brutal beating of a formerDepartment of Government Efficiency(DOGE) employee during an alleged attempted carjacking in Washington's Logan Circle. He then moved to ramp up his crackdown on Monday, invoking the Home Rule Act. Democrats and local officials pushed back, noting MPD and the U.S. Attorney's Office report violent crime is at a 30-year low, down 35% from 2023 to 2024. FBI data for the same period shows a much smaller decrease of around 9%, highlighting a substantial gap between local and federal statistics. The discrepancy stems from differences in how crimes are classified and reported to federal databases. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser described the federal action as "unsettling and unprecedented," while Democrats have introduced a joint resolution in an effort to put the brakes on the federal takeoverof police. Original article source:Hundreds arrested as Trump's Washington, DC, crime crackdown hits full stride

Hundreds arrested as Trump’s Washington, DC, crime crackdown hits full stride

Hundreds arrested as Trump's Washington, DC, crime crackdown hits full stride The Trump administration's crackdown on violent crime ...
"Sleepless in Seattle" Child Actor Ross Malinger Says He and Tom Hanks Had 'Natural Chemistry' as Father and Son

RGR Collection / Alamy Ross Malinger, who played Jonah inSleepless in Seattle, reflected on his special bond with Tom Hanks Hanks and Malinger were close on set, and the elder actor invited Malinger to a few of his movies' premieres in the following years "Tom and I worked together in harmony, and ultimately that is what I believe made this film a classic," Malinger toldEntertainment Weekly Ross Malinger is looking back on his bond with Tom Hanks. Malinger was 8 years old when he starred inSleepless in Seattleas Jonah, the son of protagonist Sam (Hanks), who set his father up with Annie (Meg Ryan). Now at 42, Malinger is reflecting on his lasting friendship with Hanks, 69. "We genuinely cared about each other," Malinger toldEntertainment Weekly. "That natural chemistry allowed me to really bring a lot of intensity and emotion to Jonah's character." Bruce Mcbroom/Tri-Star/Kobal/Shutterstock While filmingSleepless in Seattle,Hanks was "always joking around and making me laugh," Malinger said. He recalled one off-screen moment at the fish market where Hanks kept grabbing fish, moving their mouths and "making them say goofy things." Once the filming and press run had concluded, Hanks invited Malinger to two other premieres — his 1993 filmPhiladelphiaand his 1996 filmThat Thing You Do. AfterSleepless in Seattle, Malinger landed over 20 roles in TV and film before leaving Hollywood behind.He had a recurring role on CBS'sGood Adviceand Warner Brothers'Nick Freno: Licensed Teacher,plus shorter appearances onParty of Five, Seinfeld, The Simple LifeandTouched by an Angel.His last on-screen role was in a 2006 episode ofWithout a Trace. Malinger has since tried on a number of hats, including classic-car restorer, computer repair business owner and finance manager for a car dealership. Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer. Still, with his acting days largely behind him, Malinger holds dear his time onSleepless in Seattleand his special bond with Hanks. "Tom and I worked together in harmony, and ultimately that is what I believe made this film a classic," Malinger told the outlet. Read the original article onPeople

“Sleepless in Seattle” Child Actor Ross Malinger Says He and Tom Hanks Had 'Natural Chemistry' as Father and Son

"Sleepless in Seattle" Child Actor Ross Malinger Says He and Tom Hanks Had 'Natural Chemistry' as Father and Son RGR Colle...
Where Are the Hosts of "The Biggest Loser" Now? All About Their Lives Today, 5 Years After the Show Ended

Trae Patton/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty (2) ; John Britt/USA Network/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty The Biggest Loseraired from 2004 to 2020, first on NBC and later on USA Network The weight loss competition was hosted by Caroline Rhea, Alison Sweeney and Bob Harper throughout the years The show is the subject of the Netflix docuseriesFit for TV:The Reality of the Biggest Loser, for which Harper and Sweeney were interviewed The Biggest Loser— hosted over the years byCaroline Rhea,Alison SweeneyandBob Harper— was once one of NBC's biggest winners. The series — which featured people competing to lose weight for a prize of $250,000 — launched in 2004 and quickly began picking up steam. At its peak in 2009, 13.4 million viewers tuned in to watch the finale, according toThe New York Times. Comedian andSabrina the Teenage Witchstar Rhea was the show's original host, leading the series for seasons 1 through 3 beforeDays of Our Livesactress Sweeney took over. For the final two seasons, longtimeBiggest Losertrainer Harper took the helm before the series ended in 2020. The rise and fall ofThe Biggest Loserwas documented in a 2025 Netflix docuseries calledFit For TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser, which features the unfiltered thoughts and experiences of its creators, producers, the show's physician Dr. Robert Huizenga, contestants,winnersand two of its hosts — Harper and Sweeney.Fit for TVquestions if the show — which encouraged contestants to lose weight quickly through extreme dieting and exercise — was beneficial or harmful for participants. Here's where the formerBiggest Loserhosts Caroline Rhea, Alison Sweeney and Bob Harper are now. 01 of 03 Trae Patton/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty ; Phillip Faraone/WireImage Rhea was the original host ofThe Biggest Loserwhen it premiered in 2004. She only hosted the first three seasons before leaving "to pursue other interests," perVariety. Shortly after leavingThe Biggest Loser, Rhea welcomed a daughter namedAva Economopouloswith husband Costaki Economopoulos in October 2008. "She's like my little miracle baby," she told PEOPLE at the time. "All the bad stuff, and all the good stuff, it all leads you to the place that you're meant to be." Though Rhea took a break from acting and comedy to raise her little girl, she eventually returned to Hollywood. "I thought I have to be an interesting person for my child," she said. "I have in no way sacrificed anything because she's given me everything in raising her and being with her, but I want her to have a passion in her life that she loves and a purpose." Since then, she's appeared in several TV holiday movies, made a guest appearance onSabrina the Teenage WitchspinoffThe Chilling Adventures of Sabrinaand starred in Disney seriesSydney to the Maxfrom 2019 to 2021. She's also voiced Linda Flynn-Fletcher in beloved children's showPhineas and Ferbsince 2007. Rhea still performs stand-up at comedy clubs and festivals around the world. 02 of 03 Lewis Jacobs/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty ; JC Olivera/Getty Sweeney replaced Rhea asThe Biggest Loserhost in 2007 during the show's fourth season. "I am so proud to be part of the show," she toldThe Hollywood Reporterin January 2013. "I feel so good about the show — it's uplifting and inspiring and entertaining at the same time." In fact, working on the series inspired her to start doing marathons and triathlons. "The more I saw theBiggest Losercontestants do it ... I found that competitive spirit in myself and wanted to do it too," she said. However, in August 2015, she walked away from the show after eight years. "It's been an amazing run. I'm so proud," she told PEOPLE at the time. "[But] times change and situations change ... We talked and it wasn't an easy decision. It was just the right time for me to do something different." Sweeney has kept busy with acting since leavingThe Biggest Loser. She's continued her role asSami BradyinDays of Our Lives, helmed theHannah Swensenseries of movie mysteries on theHallmark Channeland has appeared in all of theLacey Chabert-ledThe Wedding Veilfilms. Her kids, son Benjamin Sanov and daughter Megan Sanov, withhusband David Sanov, areall grown up— and her son even worked with her on her the 2023 filmA Zest for Death: A Hannah Swensen Mystery. "As a parent, I always strive to teach my kids new life skills," she told PEOPLE in October 2023. "From being on set, he's developed a new understanding and appreciation of camera operations, which has been fun to watch him explore." Sweeney opened up more about her experience onThe Biggest Loserin Netflix's 2025 docuseries,Fit For TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser. "When people talk about the show negatively or have critiques of the show, I totally understand," she said. "I'm not naive or have rose-colored glasses. I see." Still, she stands behind it after seeing some of the contestants change their lives. "My goal was to have that conversation about health and wellness and giving people that idea that it's possible," she added. 03 of 03 Tyler Golden/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty ; Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images Harper appeared in all 18 seasons ofThe Biggest Loser, training contestants in the first 16 seasons andhosting the final two. In 2025'sFit For TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser, Harper shared that he thought the show was "going to be huge" before it even aired. Subsequently, he and fellow trainerJillian Michaelsplayed to the cameras. "Always remember we were trying to make anentertainingshow," he said. "What's more important for weight loss? We all know it's diet, but that becomes boring television. You know what's not boring television? To see us in a gym yelling, screaming ... and producers loved that s---. They were like, 'We want them to puke! We want the madness of it all!' " However, Harper shared that there were times that he wasn't proud of, like when he yelled at season 7's Joelle Gwynn. He also said he was "in horror" when he saw one contestant, Rachel Frederickson, come back for the finale weighing only 105 lbs. Still, he says he "will stand behind everything that I've ever done on that show." Harper added that he "would never put anyone in harm's way." In February 2017 — while the show was on hiatus — Harper suffered a heart attack that left him unconscious for two days. The experience gave him a new sense of camaraderie with theBiggest Losercontestants. "I couldn't walk around the block. I know that it's like to have to look at everything that I eat and have to change how I live and what I do," he said onFit for TV. "I understand more than I ever knew before." These days, Harper is still a fitness trainer who focuses on "all things health and wellness," according to hisInstagram. In June 2019, he got married to husband Anton Gutierrez. The couple share three dogs named Karl, Vivienne and Ralph. In January 2025, he appeared on another NBC show,The Traitorsseason 3, where he placed 15th. Harper and Michaels are no longer friends, he shared onFit for TV. "We were really closeon television," he said. "After I had my heart attack, she's the one person I never heard from.That, to me, spoke volumes." Read the original article onPeople

Where Are the Hosts of “The Biggest Loser” Now? All About Their Lives Today, 5 Years After the Show Ended

Where Are the Hosts of "The Biggest Loser" Now? All About Their Lives Today, 5 Years After the Show Ended Trae Patton/NBCU Photo B...
"The Biggest Loser" Doctor Robert Huizenga Says He 'Really Took Issue' with Some of the Show's Tactics

Courtesy of Netflix Dr. Robert Huizenga, a celebrity doctor who appeared regularly onThe Biggest Loser, is reflecting on his concerns regarding contestants' health and safety "We had a 99.9% success [rate] in losing weight .... but as the show really got popular, some things were being done that I really, I really took issue with," Dr. Huizenga says Fit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loseris streaming now on Netflix Dr. Robert Huizenga, a celebrity doctor who appeared regularly onThe Biggest Loser, is reflecting on his concerns regarding contestants' health and safety as the cameras rolled on the NBC reality series for more than a decade. In Netflix's three-part docuseriesFit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser,which premiered Friday, August 15, Dr. Huizenga, a former team doctor for the then-Los Angeles Raiders, said his experiences at the intersection of medicine and the professional sports world helped shape the weight-loss reality show. "The Biggest Loserwas totally sculpted after my experience with the Raiders and the only question was is it possible for an overweight, sedentary person to work out, not with the ability of a professional athlete, but with the intensity of a professional athlete?" Dr. Huizenga says on the show. Still, as the series progressed and showrunners faced pressure to maintain viewers' attention through 17 seasons, he says he became increasingly worried about the physical challenges contestants faced. https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cuf "We had a 99.9% success [rate] in losing weight. That was really an incredible discovery," Dr. Huizenga recalls. "But as the show really got popular, some things were being done that I really, I really took issue with." "It was scary because from season 1, you have women — 200 lbs., men — 300, and it just went up, straight line up. And with that, the ability to exercise, a straight line down. So when they do a physical challenge that puts people in harm's way, that's where I have to step in," he says. Looking back, Dr. Huizenga said he was not always aware of every aspect of the contestants' experiences. "There were times, unfortunately though, that challenges were done that I didn't see or hear about, which was the main hang-up to making it a much safer environment," Dr. Huizenga said. Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In particular, he alluded to differences in perspective between himself and the show's trainers,Bob HarperandJillian Michaels. "Every season, I pretty much said I was going to quit unless I got to talk to the trainers," he claims. "So they would force them to come in and I'd give my little half an hour speech and maybe some things changed, not as much as I would like." PEOPLE reached out to NBC for comment on the claims made inFit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser, but did not receive a response. Fit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loseris streaming now on Netflix. Read the original article onPeople

“The Biggest Loser” Doctor Robert Huizenga Says He 'Really Took Issue' with Some of the Show's Tactics

"The Biggest Loser" Doctor Robert Huizenga Says He 'Really Took Issue' with Some of the Show's Tactics Courtesy of Net...

 

LEX MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com