WASHINGTON – TheSupreme Courton June 18 rejectedchallengesto a nuclear waste storage site near Texas' border with New Mexico, a win for the federal government in a decadeslong struggle over what to do with waste that is byproduct of nuclear power plants. In a 6-3 decision, the court said Texas and oil industry interests cannot fight the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's approval of the site because they hadn't sufficiently participated in the commission's licensing proceedings. The court passed on deciding whether the commission had the authority to license the storage facility. Three conservative justices − Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito − dissented. The commission approved temporary storage sites in Texas in 2021 because nuclear power plants were running out of room and the permanent underground storage facility planned for Nevada's Yucca Mountain stalled largely due to local opposition. But Texas and oil industry interests objected to the waste being stored above ground in the Permian Basin, a prominent oil field region known for its underpopulated wide-open spaces in southwestern Texas. They also questioned the "temporary" nature of the storage site, which was designed to last decades. More:Nobody wants to live near nuclear waste. The Supreme Court mulls where to put it The federal governmentsaidthe waste has to go somewhere until a permanent location is created. Nuclear power supplies about one-fifth of the nation's electricity. The company proposing to run the Texas facility argues it's more economical to have security in one centralized location, allowing time for the land around former nuclear reactors to be restored for long-term use. While two federal appeals courts in Denver and Washington, D.C., rejected challenges to the private facility, the New Orleans-based 5thU.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Texas. The court also blocked operations at a similar site in New Mexico that officials in that state opposed. Since the U.S. began large-scale nuclear power generation in the late 1950s, nuclear fuel has powered reactors along with an ongoing political debate over the disposal of spent fuel, once it can no longer efficiently generate electricity. The "not in my backyard" dilemmaended up at the high court because the federal government never followed through on a 1982 law that was supposed to have created a permanent dumping ground for nuclear power plant waste – which continues to be considered dangerous for thousands of years. After lawmakers designed Nevada's Yucca Mountain as the only authorized site where the Department of Energy could permanently store spent nuclear fuel, the Obama administration effectively nixed the project over political and environmental concerns. It's unclear if the Trump administration, which defended the Nuclear Regulator Commission's authority to approve temporary sites, will try to revive the Yucca Mountain option as a place to store nuclear waste. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Supreme Court greenlights nuclear waste sites in Texas
