Nadiya Hussain Says She 'Vomited' After Realizing She'd Been Abused as a 5-Year-Old During Sex Education ClassNew Foto - Nadiya Hussain Says She 'Vomited' After Realizing She'd Been Abused as a 5-Year-Old During Sex Education Class

We need To Talk/YouTube Nadiya Hussain opened up about the alleged sexual abuse she suffered at the age of 5 during an appearance on theWe Need To Talkpodcast on July 15 The TV chef recalled how she "vomited" after realizing she'd been abused during a sex education class Hussain also shared how she has never spoken to parents about the alleged incident Nadiya Hussainis opening up about the sexual abuse she allegedly suffered at the age of 5. During an appearance on theWe Need To Talkpodcast on Tuesday, July 15,The Great British Baking Showwinner 40, spoke candidly to hostPaul C Brunsonabout one of the most traumatic memories from her childhood. "As a 5-year-old, I was sexually abused by my cousin," Hussain alleged. "I didn't really know that that was sexual abuse until I was in my biology lesson in Year 8 [of school] and we were having a sex education class." "The penny dropped. I put the two together, and I was like, 'That happened to me,' " the TV chef continued. "I remember vomiting profusely. My teacher said, 'Are you unwell?' And I said, 'No, I'm fine.' " Hussain recalled that she kept quiet instead of telling the teacher because her alleged abuser was a cousin who was constantly around her family. "He was there all the time, and he was in our house and he was upstairs, and he was everywhere," she said. When Brunson, 50, asked how her family reacted once they found out about the abuse, Hussain revealed she's never spoken to her parents about it. "We don't talk about it," Hussain said. "Nobody talks about it. I can sit here and tell the whole world, but I cannot have that conversation with my mum and dad ever." The baker revealed her parents have never read her book, before adding that she has debated bringing up the alleged abuse she suffered in a conversation with them. "Would I like to if they were different people? Yeah," she said of talking to her parents. "I know them too well, I know that, I know what I'd be met with." Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "I live in a community where the men are protected. And to be fair, we live in a society where men are always protected," Hussain continued. "And I don't want anyone to say that it was my fault, because I think that's what I'm going to hear. And I think I don't want to hear that, if I hear that I'll lose it." "What I would hate to see is, I feel like I would be blamed and he would be protected, and I just can't dig that up," she added. PBS/Love Productions / Courtesy: Everett Collection Hussain went on to reflect on being bullied at school from the ages of 4 to 17 by two boys, who she also claims attempted to sexually assault her. Elsewhere in the podcast, she shared her experience ofracismwhile growing up and the additional trauma that came with her TV fame. TheGBBSstar recalled producers having to move into her house after she received death threats and having panic buttons installed in her home that would alert police. "It's soul-destroying because somebody hates you enough to want you dead," she said. "And then you ask yourself, 'Why?' " We need To Talk/YouTube "Am I that bad? Why do you want me dead?" she continued. "I couldn't understand it, it was like I lost my faith in humanity completely." Hussain said her family now lives in a house that's overlooked by seven neighbors to feel protected. "If there are any problems, we've taught our kids to go out into the garden and shout because there will be a neighbor who hears you," she added. If you suspect child abuse, call the Childhelp National Child Abuse Hotline at 1-800-4-A-Child or 1-800-422-4453, or go to www.childhelp.org. All calls are toll-free and confidential. The hotline is available 24/7 in more than 170 languages. If you or someone you know has been a victim of sexual abuse, text "STRENGTH" to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis counselor. Read the original article onPeople

Nadiya Hussain Says She 'Vomited' After Realizing She'd Been Abused as a 5-Year-Old During Sex Education Class

Nadiya Hussain Says She 'Vomited' After Realizing She'd Been Abused as a 5-Year-Old During Sex Education Class We need To Talk/Y...
Wondering Why 'Bachelor in Paradise' Moved to Costa Rica? It's Complicated and Fans Aren't HappyNew Foto - Wondering Why 'Bachelor in Paradise' Moved to Costa Rica? It's Complicated and Fans Aren't Happy

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Bachelor in Paradiseis known for many things: Being chaotic. Traumatizing an entire population of crabs who are forced to watch strangers make out in their literal home. And above all else, those daybeds that have truly SEEN SOME THINGS. But this season is looking a little different, mostly because the show ditched its longtime filming location in Mexico and moved to Costa Rica's Azura Beach Resort. And fans who are fond of the show's iconic original location aren't exactly thrilled. I miss the little crabs they show in between different segments ☹️#BachelorInParadisepic.twitter.com/VUPBnOXRmT — here 4 the wrong reasons (@here4thewrgrsn)July 15, 2025 Reject modernity, embrace tradition#bachelorinparadisepic.twitter.com/wmBA9idzHH — nat 🧜🏼♀️ (@natalie_marina)July 8, 2025 So, why the move? There are several reasons, and chief among them is the need for air conditioning and elevators now that the Goldens are on the show. "All of those things went into the thought behind going to Costa Rica and finding somewhere different," showrunner Scott Teti toldVariety. "It was a great experience. I think the hotel and the vibe of everything feels a little chicer and more elevated. There's air conditioning! So if the cast is happier, you're going to get a better response. And I think the response was extremely positive with their experience." Scott also toldEntertainment Weeklythat "I think the drive to move was based on shaking things up stylistically with a new vibe and a new kind ofParadise. This also is very production friendly. It's a very private beach. It's very secluded, but it also has the ability for our production to stay on one side of the sister hotel, and the newer portion of the Azuara Beach Resort, where we will be filming, is right next door. It's this beautiful hot, new location." Kay! You Might Also Like Here's What NOT to Wear to a Wedding Meet the Laziest, Easiest Acne Routine You'll Ever Try

Wondering Why ‘Bachelor in Paradise’ Moved to Costa Rica? It's Complicated and Fans Aren't Happy

Wondering Why 'Bachelor in Paradise' Moved to Costa Rica? It's Complicated and Fans Aren't Happy "Hearst Magazines and ...
Michael Jackson Estate Files Response to Paris Jackson's Questioning of 'Premium Payouts': 'Well Deserved and Reasonable'New Foto - Michael Jackson Estate Files Response to Paris Jackson's Questioning of 'Premium Payouts': 'Well Deserved and Reasonable'

Pool Photographer/WireImage; Swan Gallet/WWD via Getty Michael Jackson's estate responded to Paris Jackson's court filing, questioning "premium payouts" made in 2018 for unrecorded attorney time The estate claimed that the attorneys were "instrumental and critical in assisting and supporting the Executors in achieving unprecedented results for the Estate," hence the payments A hearing is scheduled regarding the issue on Wednesday, July 16 Michael Jackson's estate has responded toParis Jackson's questioning of"premium payouts" made for unrecorded attorney timein 2018. According to court documents filed on July 15 and obtained by PEOPLE, the late singer's estate claim that the lawyers who received what his daughter Paris, 27, called "premium payouts" were compensated based on their "experience, negotiating skills, relationships, and knowledge of the entertainment and international music publishing and recording businesses." His estate claims that the attorneys "were instrumental and critical in assisting and supporting the Executors in achieving unprecedented results for the Estate, including without limitation, the more than$287 million return on the EMI investment." Sony bought Michael's estate's EMI share in 2018, during which the alleged six-month period, executors requested approval for $625,000 in payments to three law firms. Additionally, the attorneys "cannot be adequately measured or fairly compensated by an hourly rate fee payment." Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty "It is not unusual and in fact is quite common, in the entertainment/music business for attorneys with the level of skills, experience, and relationships of Mr. Weitzman and Mr. Katz to receive compensation in addition to their hourly rate fee payment," the estate added in their response. Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The executors of the "Thriller" singer's estate said that the attorney's compensation was "well deserved and reasonable given the nature and difficulty of the tasks performed, the results achieved and the unprecedented benefit of the respective firms' services to the Estate." A hearing regarding the issue is expected to take place on Wednesday, July 15. On June 24, Paris had filed court documents, as she was "concerned" regarding the "practice of granting so-called 'premium payments' for unrecorded attorney time, much less paying one-hundred percent of any such extraordinary amounts." The executors requested approval in 2018 for $625,000 in payments to three law firms, which Paris referred to as "uncaptured time," lacking an explanation regarding "why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment." The documents claim that two of the law firms involved had received the "premium payments" had violated the "Court's order allowing only partial payment of attorneys' fees until Court approval is obtained." The payments were "at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel," Paris's filing alleges. KMazur/WireImage Michael was over $500 million in debtat the time of his death and owed money to over 60 creditors, per court documents obtained by PEOPLE in June 2024. Before he died, he was planning acomeback, which included a residency at London's O2 Arena. Leading up to it, however, Michael was falling further and further into debt each year.The Los Angeles Timesreported that he was accruing $30 million in debt annually. His estate became responsible for the money Michael owed after his death. Paris, along with her brothers Prince and Bigi, arebeneficiaries of Michael's estate. Read the original article onPeople

Michael Jackson Estate Files Response to Paris Jackson's Questioning of 'Premium Payouts': 'Well Deserved and Reasonable'

Michael Jackson Estate Files Response to Paris Jackson's Questioning of 'Premium Payouts': 'Well Deserved and Reasonable...
Senate to move on Trump request to cut foreign aid, public media fundingNew Foto - Senate to move on Trump request to cut foreign aid, public media funding

Washington —The Senate could move forward as soon as Tuesday on a request from the White House to claw back $9.4 billion in funds for international aid and public broadcasting as Congress faces a Friday deadline to act. In what's known as a rescissions package, the White House in Junerequestedthat Congress cancel billions in funding that had previously been approved for spending, starting the clock on a process that gives lawmakers 45 days to act. The move seeks to make permanent some of the Department of Government Efficiency's spending cuts, with the package's primary focus being slashing foreign aid. But it would also effectively cut off federal funding for NPR and PBS. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said he hoped to hold the first procedural votes Tuesday, though he was still having conversations with some members who are resistant to pulling back all of the funding. On Tuesday morning, one of the Republican members who had concerns, Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, said he would back the bill. "We wanted to make sure tribal broadcast services in South Dakota continued to operate which provide potentially lifesaving emergency alerts,"Rounds posted on social media. "We worked with the Trump administration to find Green New Deal money that could be reallocated to continue grants to tribal radio stations without interruption. We appreciate OMB Director Russ Vought and Senate Leadership for working with us to favorably resolve this issue." Last month, theHouse approvedthe request, overcoming opposition from all Democrats and four Republicans. The rescissions package The rescissions request would cut $8.3 billion for the United States Agency for International Development, or USAID, along with other international assistance programs — from peacekeeping efforts to refugee assistance and climate projects. Also included in the package is a proposed $1.1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the private nonprofit that serves as the steward of the funding to NPR and PBS. The White House has targeted the entities, claiming they have "spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'" But some Senate Republicans have opposed components of the package, like cuts to a program aimed at combating HIV and AIDS globally. Started by former President George W. Bush, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, has been credited for saving millions of lives around the world. Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, told reporters last week that she wants to strike the PEPFAR rescissions, saying, "I can't imagine why we would want to terminate that program." Collins, the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, pushed back when Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought testified to the panel in June that "no lifesaving treatment will be impacted by this rescissions package" and that "anyone currently receiving lifesaving treatment will continue to receive that treatment." "When you look at PEPFAR, you are eliminating a lot of the prevention programs," Collins said, also questioning whether the package would harm efforts to prevent the spread of tuberculosis, polio and malaria and what effects it would have on maternal and child health programs that help feed malnourished children. "Those are all programs that have been proven effective." "These are not only the right thing to do for humanitarian reasons, but they're incredible instruments of soft power," Collins said. Others have raised concerns aboutcuts to local radio and television stations, especially in rural areas where they take on added significance as a means of communicating emergency messages. Rounds, a South Dakota Republican who also sits on the Appropriations Committee, told reporters last week that he's not comfortable with some of the provisions like cuts to public broadcasting. But he said Tuesday that he had worked with the Trump administration to find funding and is now prepared to back the package. Thune said Monday that there were ongoing discussions about an amendment process on the rescissions package. "I'm hoping that as we get on that bill we can see some savings achieved that will complement the things we already accomplished in reconciliation," Thune said last week, referencing the massive tax and spending package that Congress approved earlier this month. Amending the package would mean the House would have to sign off on the changes. And with the Friday deadline, time is running out to do so before the request expires. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said Monday he hopes the Senate sticks with the House-approved package. "I think you've got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did," Johnson said. In the Senate, rescissions bills are not subject to the 60-vote threshold needed to advance most legislation, requiring only a simple majority. But with just 53 Republicans, Senate GOP leaders can only afford to lose a handful of their members to approve the package. President Trump weighed in on the rescissions push late last week, saying in aposton Truth Social that it's "very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill," citing the public broadcasting cuts in particular. The president warned that any Republican who doesn't support the clawback in funding "will not have my support or Endorsement." Meanwhile, the rescissions push has sparked frustration among Democrats, who have little ability to stand in its way. But an upcoming spending fight is another story. Democrats have begun suggesting that the GOP effort to claw back already approved congressional funds could have an impact on their willingness to work across the aisle on government funding down the road. Each year, Congress approves funding to keep the federal government running before the funds are disbursed to government agencies and programs. The rescissions process allows Congress to cancel funds that the federal government has not yet spent. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned about the upcoming rescissions push in a letter to his colleagues upon the return from the Fourth of July recess, arguing that the package's passage "would be an affront to the bipartisan appropriations process." The New York Democrat called it "absurd" for the GOP to expect Democrats to engage in a bipartisan appropriations process that could be undermined by rescissions. "Republicans are, in effect, proposing Congress negotiate bipartisan deals in the Committee room, while they retreat to a backroom to rubberstamp President Trump's purely partisan scheme that only needs a simple majority to pass to tear up those very same agreements," Schumer wrote. In response, Thune said on the Senate floor last week that he was "disappointed" to see Schumer "implicitly threaten to shut down the government," while adding that he's "hopeful that that is not the position" of Senate Democrats. When asked by reporters about the possibility of a shutdown, Schumer said, "Ask the Republicans why they are heading on this path.""We are doing everything we can to keep the bipartisan appropriations process going, and they're undermining it with rescissions," Schumer added. Trump pushes senators to make $9.4 trillion in spending cuts Congressman scolds protester at college antisemitism hearing: "Shut up and get out of here" Anger at House committee hearing on antisemitism in college campuses

Senate to move on Trump request to cut foreign aid, public media funding

Senate to move on Trump request to cut foreign aid, public media funding Washington —The Senate could move forward as soon as Tuesday on a r...
As Waltz faces UN post hearings, an update on the Signal situation that led to his initial oustingNew Foto - As Waltz faces UN post hearings, an update on the Signal situation that led to his initial ousting

AsMike Waltz,President Donald Trump'snominee for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, appears before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Tuesday for his confirmation hearing, focus returns to hisousting as national security adviserover what some referred to as "Signalgate." The former Florida Republican congressman served mere weeks in Trump's administration before revelations that he mistakenly added journalist Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic to aprivate Signal chatthat was used todiscuss sensitive military plans, including planning for strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen. Calls came quickly forDefense Secretary Pete Hegsethto be removed from office, accompanied by criticism of the Trump administration forfailing to take actionagainst the top national security officials who discussed plans for the military strike in Signal. After weeks of scrutiny, Waltz left his security post but wasswiftly nominatedto the U.N. position. Months after the chat was disclosed, questions remain over the controversy, including if federal laws were violated, if classified information was exposed on the commercial messaging app and if anyone else will face consequences. Here's what we know and don't know: ___ KNOWN:Signal is a publicly available appthat provides encrypted communications, but it can be hacked. It is not approved for carrying classified information. On March 14, one day before the strikes, the Defense Department cautioned personnel about the vulnerability of Signal, specifically that Russia was attempting to hack the app, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak to the press and spoke on the condition of anonymity. One known vulnerability is that a malicious actor, if they have access to a person's phone, can link their own device to the user's Signal — and monitor messages remotely. NOT KNOWN: How frequently the administration and the Defense Department use Signal for sensitive government communications, and whether those on the chat were using unauthorized personal devices to transmit or receive those messages. The department put out an instruction in 2023 restricting what information could be posted on unauthorized and unclassified systems. At aSenate Intelligence Committee hearingearlier this year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard would not say whether she was accessing the information on her personal phone or government-issued phone, citing an ongoing investigation by the National Security Council. ___ KNOWN: The government has a requirement under the Presidential Records Act to archive all of those planning discussions. NOT KNOWN: Whether anyone in the group archived the messages as required by law to a government server. The images of the text chainposted by The Atlanticshow that the messages were set to disappear in one week. ___ KNOWN: Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols — known in the IT industry as a"dirty" internet line— set up in his office to use Signal on a personal computer, two people familiar with the line have told The Associated Press. Other Pentagon offices have used them, particularly if there's a need to monitor information or websites that would otherwise be blocked. The biggest advantage of using such a line is that the user would not show up as an IP address assigned to the Defense Department — essentially the user is masked, according to a senior U.S. official familiar with military network security. NOT KNOWN: If use of the line left any Defense-related materials more vulnerable than they would have been on a Pentagon secure line. ___ KNOWN: The chat group included 18 members, including Jeffrey Goldberg, top editor of The Atlantic. The group, called "Houthi PC Small Group," likely for Houthi "principals committee" — was comprised of Trump's senior-most advisers on national security, including Gabbard, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. The National Security Council said the text chain "appears to be authentic." NOT KNOWN: How Goldberg got added. Waltz said he built the message chain and didn't know how Goldberg ended up on the chat. He called it a mistake. ___ KNOWN: Just hours beforethe attack on the Houthis in Yemenbegan, Hegseth shared details on the timing, targets, weapons and sequence of strikes that would take place. NOT KNOWN:Whether the information was classified. Gabbard, Ratcliffe and the White House have all said it was not classified, and Hegseth said the same in a post on social media. Democrats said that strains credulity. ___ KNOWN: Hegseth hasadamantly deniedthat "war plans" were texted on Signal, something current and former U.S. officials called "semantics." War plans carry a specific meaning. They often refer to the numbered and highly classified planning documents — sometimes thousands of pages long — that would inform U.S. decisions in case of a major conflict. But the information Hegseth did post — specific attack details selecting human and weapons storage targets — was a subset of those plans and was likely informed by the same classified intelligence. Posting those details to an unclassified app risked tipping off adversaries of the pending attack and could have put U.S. service members at risk, multiple U.S. officials said. Sharing that information on a commercial app like Signal in advance of a strike "would be a violation of everything that we're about," said former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who served under Democratic President Barack Obama. NOT KNOWN: If anyone outside the messaging group got access to the Signal texts. ___ KNOWN: Hegseth began cracking down on unauthorized leaks of information inside the Defense Department, and his chief of staff issued a memo on March 21 saying the Pentagon would use polygraph tests to determine the sources of recent leaks and prosecute them. NOT KNOWN: Whether Hegseth will take responsibility for the unauthorized release of national defense information regarding the attack plans on the Houthis. Trump in March bristled at a suggestion that Hegseth should step down, saying "He's doing a great job. He had nothing to do with it." ___ KNOWN: In April, Dan Caldwell, a senior Hegseth adviser who in the Signal chat had been designated as the secretary's point person, wasplaced on administrative leaveand escorted out of the Pentagon by security. Officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters told The AP that the former Marine's sudden downfall was tied to an investigation into unauthorized disclosure of department information. NOT KNOWN: If any others affiliated with the Signal situation will face reprisals. ___ KNOWN: Also in April, Hegseth wasforced to defend himselfagainst a second assertion that he shared classified material through an unapproved and unsecured network, this time taking airstrike information from a military communications channel and sharing it in a Signal chat with his wife, his brother and others. A person familiar with the chat confirmed to The AP that Hegseth pulled the information — such as launch times and bomb drop times of U.S. warplanes about to strike Houthi targets in Yemen — he posted in the chat from a secure communications channel used by U.S. Central Command. NOT KNOWN: If that's the extent of Hegseth's Signal usage. ___ KNOWN: The Pentagon's watchdog has begun looking intoHegseth's use of Signal, and also whether any of Hegseth's aides wereasked to delete Signal messagesthat may haveshared sensitive military informationwith a reporter. NOT KNOWN: What the inspector general will find, or what will be done as a result of those findings. ___ Kinnard can be reached athttp://x.com/MegKinnardAP.

As Waltz faces UN post hearings, an update on the Signal situation that led to his initial ousting

As Waltz faces UN post hearings, an update on the Signal situation that led to his initial ousting AsMike Waltz,President Donald Trump's...
Millions of undocumented immigrants will no longer be eligible for bond hearings: ICENew Foto - Millions of undocumented immigrants will no longer be eligible for bond hearings: ICE

Immigrants who arrive in the United States illegally will no longer be eligible for a bond hearing, a move that comes as the Trump administration ramps up efforts to keep immigrants who enter the country legally detained, sources familiar with the matter told ABC News. The new policy change was announced in a memo last week from the acting ICE Director Todd Lyons. The memo was described to ABC News. Before the policy change, immigrants could request a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The extensive new detention policy is also expected to face legal challenges The news was first reported byThe Washington Post. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Millions of undocumented immigrants will no longer be eligible for bond hearings: ICE

Millions of undocumented immigrants will no longer be eligible for bond hearings: ICE Immigrants who arrive in the United States illegally w...

 

LEX MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com